Projecting a block up to compress a spring

  • Thread starter Thread starter zumi78878
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Spring
AI Thread Summary
A block projected up a frictionless incline compresses a spring while converting its kinetic energy. The initial kinetic energy is 16 J, and as the block compresses the spring by 0.20 m, gravitational potential energy must be considered. The calculations show that the gravitational potential energy increases by 3.80 J and the spring's potential energy is 4 J. The total energy conservation equation indicates that the kinetic energy at the point of maximum compression is 8.2 J. It is essential to account for the increase in gravitational potential energy during this process.
zumi78878
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A spring( k=200 n/m) is fixed at the top of a frictionless plane inclined at angle θ=40 degrees . A 1.0 kg block is projected up the plane from an initial position that is distance d=0.60m from the end of the relaxed spring with an initial kinetic energy of 16J.

a) what is the kinetic energy of the block at the instant it has compressed the spring 0.20m?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



My Answer:

Et1 = Et2

Ek1 = Et1 = 16J

Et2 = Ek2 +Eg2 + Es2
16J = Ek2 + (1)(9.8)(0.6 +0.2)(sin40°) + (1/2)(0.2)(0.2)2
16J = Ek2 + 5.04J + 4J
Ek2 = 6.96J

My question is: do we have to account for the increase in gravitational potential when the block compresses the spring? because the block moves up higher when it compresses the spring. Thanks

Professor's Answer:

Ug = mgh
= 1(9.8)0.6 sin 40
= 3.80 J
Us = ½ k Δx2
= ½ 200 (0.2)2
= 4 J
And we have
Total Energy before = Total Energy after
K0 + Ug0 + Us0 = K + Ug + Us
16 + 0 + 0 = K + 3.8 + 4
K = 8.2 J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zumi78878 said:
My question is: do we have to account for the increase in gravitational potential when the block compresses the spring? because the block moves up higher when it compresses the spring. Thanks
Of course you do. Looks like your professor made an error.
 
Doc Al said:
Of course you do. Looks like your professor made an error.

thanks a lot.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top