Proof by induction of polynomial differentiability

ssayan3
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that (ax^n)' = nax^n-1 using induction.

I am very weak with induction proof, and I haven't had much trouble proving the basis step, but I can't seem to finish it...

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


1. Prove (ax)' = a

(a(x+h) - a(x))/h = (ax + ah - ax)/h = (ah)/h = a

2. Prove (ax^n)' = nax^n-1
? I can't seem to get my algebra right...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In proving your base case using the definition of the derivative, you need to do this as a limit. Are you required to use the definition of the derivative in this problem? If not it's much simpler to show that d/dx(ax) = a d/d(x) = a, using the constant multiple rule and the power rule.

The next step is to assume that d/dx(axn) = naxn+1. Then use that to prove that d/dx(axn+1) = (n+1)axn+2. If you're not required to use the definition of the derivative, you can do this using the product rule, keeping in mind that axn+1 = axn * x.
 
This is for an analysis class, so yes, I would think that I would have to use the definition of derivative in this one...
 
Just because it's an analysis class doesn't necessarily mean that you have to use the definition of the derivative. That's an assumption you are making that may or may not be justified.

If if turns out that you do have to use the definition, it shouldn't be that hard for this proof. If you use the definition, however, you need to include limits. What you showed for your base case is very sloppy, not using limits at all. It should look something like this.
\frac{d(ax)}{dx}~=~\lim_{h \rightarrow 0}\frac{a(x + h) -ax}{h}~=~\lim_{h \rightarrow 0}\frac{ax +ah - ax}{h}~=~\lim_{h \rightarrow 0}\frac{ah}{h}~=~a
 
Let P(n) be the statement that for the natural number n, (ax^n)' = nax^{n-1}. Since you've already proven that P(1) holds, assume that P(k) holds and complete the proof by showing that this implies that P(k+1) holds. So you should now start with,

(ax^{k+1})' = (ax^kx)'

Can you see the next step that you should take?
 
Haha, fantastic! Thanks to both of you. That makes things much easier to understand for me.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top