Proof for Γ(p+1/2) using Double Factorial and nΓ(n)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the equation Γ(p+1/2) = ((2p)!/4^p p!)√π for positive integers p using double factorials and induction. Participants confirm the use of Euler's reflection formula as a valid approach. The proof involves applying the functional equation of the gamma function and leveraging the induction hypothesis. Key steps include establishing the base case for p=0 and performing algebraic manipulations with factorials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gamma function properties, specifically Γ(n) and Γ(n+1).
  • Familiarity with double factorial notation and its applications.
  • Knowledge of mathematical induction techniques.
  • Experience with Euler's reflection formula and its implications in proofs.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the gamma function, focusing on Γ(n) and its functional equations.
  • Learn about double factorials and their role in combinatorial mathematics.
  • Review mathematical induction methods and practice applying them in proofs.
  • Explore Euler's reflection formula and its applications in advanced calculus.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying advanced calculus, and anyone interested in gamma function properties and proof techniques.

JKC

Homework Statement


Prove that for a positive integer, p:

https://www.physicsforums.com/posts/5859454/I've tried this to little avail for the better part of an hour - I know there's a double factorial somewhere down the line but I've been unable to expand for the correct expression in terms of "p".

Homework Equations


Γ(p+1/2) = ((2p)!/4^p p!))√π

nΓ(n) = Γ(n+1)

The Attempt at a Solution




 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are required to show us, what you've tried. Are you allowed to use Euler's reflection formula? The proofs I've found all uses it.
 
fresh_42 said:
You are required to show us, what you've tried. Are you allowed to use Euler's reflection formula? The proofs I've found all uses it.

Yes the reflection formula is allowed. I tried applying it but wasn't able to solve. And sorry but writing out all these wrong workings would have taken quite some time. I will update the OP with some of my notes if there isn't anything when I wake up in a few hours.
 
You can use ##\Gamma(p+\frac{1}{2}) = \Gamma ((p-\frac{1}{2}) + 1)## and prove it with induction, because the functional equation gives you an expression with ##\Gamma (p-\frac{1}{2})=\Gamma((p-1)+\frac{1}{2})## for which the induction hypothesis applies. The reflection formula gives the induction base ##(p=0)##, and the rest is some algebra with factorials.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes JKC
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K