Proof for Γ(p+1/2) using Double Factorial and nΓ(n)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around proving the relationship for the gamma function, specifically Γ(p+1/2), using double factorials and the equation nΓ(n) = Γ(n+1). Participants are exploring the mathematical properties and identities related to the gamma function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find a way to express Γ(p+1/2) in terms of double factorials but struggles with the correct expansion. Some participants inquire about the use of Euler's reflection formula and its relevance to the proof. Others suggest using induction as a potential method to approach the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on possible approaches, such as using induction and the reflection formula. There is an acknowledgment of the need for the original poster to share their attempts to facilitate further assistance.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster is allowed to use Euler's reflection formula, which may influence the direction of their proof. There is also a mention of the complexity involved in detailing previous attempts, which may affect the flow of the discussion.

JKC

Homework Statement


Prove that for a positive integer, p:

https://www.physicsforums.com/posts/5859454/I've tried this to little avail for the better part of an hour - I know there's a double factorial somewhere down the line but I've been unable to expand for the correct expression in terms of "p".

Homework Equations


Γ(p+1/2) = ((2p)!/4^p p!))√π

nΓ(n) = Γ(n+1)

The Attempt at a Solution




 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are required to show us, what you've tried. Are you allowed to use Euler's reflection formula? The proofs I've found all uses it.
 
fresh_42 said:
You are required to show us, what you've tried. Are you allowed to use Euler's reflection formula? The proofs I've found all uses it.

Yes the reflection formula is allowed. I tried applying it but wasn't able to solve. And sorry but writing out all these wrong workings would have taken quite some time. I will update the OP with some of my notes if there isn't anything when I wake up in a few hours.
 
You can use ##\Gamma(p+\frac{1}{2}) = \Gamma ((p-\frac{1}{2}) + 1)## and prove it with induction, because the functional equation gives you an expression with ##\Gamma (p-\frac{1}{2})=\Gamma((p-1)+\frac{1}{2})## for which the induction hypothesis applies. The reflection formula gives the induction base ##(p=0)##, and the rest is some algebra with factorials.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JKC

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K