Proof for Vectors Product: (A×B) . (B×A) + (A . B)^2 = A^2 . B^2"

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around proving the equation (A×B) . (B×A) + (A . B)^2 = A^2 . B^2. Participants explore the manipulation of vector identities and the properties of dot and cross products to reach the proof. There is a clarification regarding the notation, emphasizing that A^2 should be interpreted as A . A, not as a scalar squared. Concerns are raised about ensuring both sides of the equation are scalars, as the left side results in a scalar quantity. The conversation highlights the importance of precise vector notation in mathematical proofs.
JasonHathaway
Messages
113
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Proof that (A×B) . (B×A) + (A . B)^2= A^2 . B^2

Homework Equations



A×(B×C)=(A . C)B - (A . B)C

The Attempt at a Solution



Assuming K=(A×B)
K . (B×A) + (A . B)^2 = A^2 . B^2
B . (A×K) + (A . B)^2 = A^2 . B^2
B . [A×(A×B)] + (A . B)^2 = A^2 . B^2
B . [(A . B)A - (A . A)B] + (A . B)(A . B) = A^2 . B^2
(A . B)(B . A) - (A . A)(B . B) + (A . B)(A . B) = A^2 . B^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JasonHathaway said:

Homework Statement



Proof that (A×B) . (B×A) + (A . B)^2= A^2 . B^2
Shouldn't the right side be |A|2 |B|2? The left side is a scalar (i.e., a number), so the right side needs to be a scalar as well.
JasonHathaway said:

Homework Equations



A×(B×C)=(A . C)B - (A . B)C

The Attempt at a Solution



Assuming K=(A×B)
K . (B×A) + (A . B)^2 = A^2 . B^2
B . (A×K) + (A . B)^2 = A^2 . B^2
B . [A×(A×B)] + (A . B)^2 = A^2 . B^2
B . [(A . B)A - (A . A)B] + (A . B)(A . B) = A^2 . B^2
(A . B)(B . A) - (A . A)(B . B) + (A . B)(A . B) = A^2 . B^2
 
Isn't the dot product of a vector (A for example) with itself is equal to A^2?

I see that the idea behind this proof is to eliminate the (A . B)(B . A) and (A . B)(A . B)
 
JasonHathaway said:
Isn't the dot product of a vector (A for example) with itself is equal to A^2?
Strictly speaking, no, but I understand what you're trying to say. The product of a vector with itself (which you write as A2) is normally written as ##A \cdot A## or ##A \times A##, depending on which kind of product you mean. Another argument against A2 is that it can't be extended to, say, A3, because ##A \cdot A \cdot A## isn't defined. (The first dot product produces a scalar, which can't be dotted with a vector.)
JasonHathaway said:
I see that the idea behind this proof is to eliminate the (A . B)(B . A) and (A . B)(A . B)
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top