MHB Proof of a linear transformation not being onto

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A linear map T: Rn → Rm is not onto if m > n, as established through a proof by contradiction. The discussion emphasizes using the rank-nullity theorem and properties of linear transformations to demonstrate that the dimension of the image of T cannot exceed n, leading to a contradiction if m > n. The counterpositive argument confirms that if T is onto, then m must be less than or equal to n. This conclusion is supported by examining the basis of Rn and the implications of spanning sets in Rm.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear transformations and their properties
  • Familiarity with the rank-nullity theorem
  • Knowledge of vector space dimensions
  • Basic concepts of proof techniques, particularly proof by contradiction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the rank-nullity theorem in detail
  • Learn about linear independence and spanning sets in vector spaces
  • Explore proof techniques, especially proof by contradiction
  • Investigate the implications of dimensionality in linear maps
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, educators teaching vector spaces, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of linear transformations and their dimensional constraints.

baseball3030
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
proof onto

Prove: A linear Map T:Rn->Rm is an onto function :
The only way I have thought about doing this problem is by proving the contrapositive:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
baseball3030 said:
Prove: A linear Map T:Rn->Rm is not onto if m>n.
The only way I have thought about doing this problem is by proving the contrapositive:

If m<=n then T:Rn->Rm is onto.

I would start by letting there be a transformation
matrix with dimension mxn.

Then the only thing I can think of doing is using the rank nullity thm to show that the dimension of the range=dimension of v. Does anyone know of any other ways to go about this or if my way would be correct? Thank you so much

The counterpositive is "If T is onto, then m<=n" It's easier to do it by the theorem that says that the dimensions of the kernel and of the image of T add to n.
 
You can do a direct proof, and I do not think one needs to invoke rank-nullity.

let $B = \{v_1,\dots,v_n\}$ be a basis for $\Bbb R^n$.

Consider the set $T(B) \subset \Bbb R^m$.

If $u \in T(\Bbb R^n) = \text{im}(T)$ we have:

$u = T(x)$ for some $x = c_1v_1 + \cdots + c_nv_n \in \Bbb R^n$.

Thus:

$u = c_1T(v_1) + \cdots c_nT(v_n)$, which shows $T(B)$ spans $\text{im}(T)$.

Since $|T(B)| \leq n < m$, we have that the dimension of $\text{im}(T) \leq n < m$.

However, if $\text{im}(T) = \Bbb R^m$, we have that $T(B)$ spans $\Bbb R^m$ leading to:

$m \leq |T(B)| \leq n < m$, a contradiction.

As a general rule, functions can, at best, only "preserve" the "size" of their domain, they cannot enlarge it. Dimension, for vector spaces, is one way of measuring "size".

While it is technically possible to have a function from $\Bbb R^n \to \Bbb R^m$ where $m > n$ (so called "space-filling functions") that is onto, such functions turn out to be rather bizarre and cannot be linear (they do not preserve linear combinations). Linear maps cannot "grow in dimension", for the same reason the column rank cannot exceed the number of rows in a matrix (even if we have more columns than rows).
 
How are you able to say that
Since |T(B)|≤n<m , we have that the dimension of im(T)≤n<m ?

I understand the T(B)≤n but don't know how you know that n<m?

I understand everything up to that point. Thank you very much, I appreciate it.
 
$n < m$ is given by the problem, yes?
 
Yeah but the problem states that the linear map is not onto if m<n so are you assuming that it is onto and then arriving at a contradiction? Thanks,
 
Yes, I am doing a proof by contradiction (or reductio ad absurdum).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K