Proof of commutative property in exponential matrices using power series

Paalfaal
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to prove eA eB = eA + B using the power series expansion eXt = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}Xntn/n!

and so
eA eB = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}An/n! \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}Bn/n!


I think the binomial theorem is the way to go: (x + y)n = \displaystyle \binom{n}{k} xn - k yk = \displaystyle \binom{n}{k} yn - k xk, ie. it's only true for AB = BA.



I'm really bad at manipulating series and matrices. Could I please get some hints?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct that the binomial theorem will be useful. The theorem you're trying to prove IS only valid if AB = BA, so the fact that the binomial theorem breaks down otherwise is not a concern. Personally I think I would find it easier to start from the opposite direction than you

\sum_{n = 0}^\infty \frac{(A + B)^n}{n!} = \sum_{n = 0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!} \sum_{k=0}^n \left(<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> n \\<br /> k \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right) A^k B^{n-k}
= \sum_{n = 0}^\infty \sum_{k=0}^n \frac{1}{(n-k)!(k)!}A^k B^{n-k}

Now what I'll do is pull out all the terms where k=0 from the sum

= I \left( I + B + \frac{1}{2} B^2 + \frac{1}{6} B^3 + \ldots \right) + \sum_{n = 1}^\infty \sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{(n-k)!(k)!}A^k B^{n-k}

Can you follow what I did there? Notice the lower bound on the sums changed. Let me do it for two more terms so you definitely get the idea

= I \left( I + B + \frac{1}{2} B^2 + \frac{1}{6} B^3 + \ldots \right)
+ A \left( I + B + \frac{1}{2} B^2 + \frac{1}{6} B^3 + \ldots \right)
+ \frac{A}{2} \left( I + B + \frac{1}{2} B^2 + \frac{1}{6} B^3 + \ldots \right)
+ \sum_{n = 3}^\infty \sum_{k=3}^n \frac{1}{(n-k)!(k)!}A^k B^{n-k}

Notice that after k \ge 2 we need to start pulling out factors of \frac{1}{k!}. Okay now can you see how this process would continue? How would you write down the above idea using the sum notation instead of the \ldots I used? Once you figure that out I think you'll be able to prove your result.
 
By the way if you're trying to write a rigorous proof, I would concentrate on proving the first statement I made where I pulled out some terms. Then you can easily pull out an A factor, and shift indices; and then work by induction.
 
It might be a good idea to first prove the formula for products of series and then use that result along with the binomial theorem to prove the result you want.
$$\bigg(\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n\bigg)\bigg(\sum_{k=0}^\infty b_n\bigg)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\sum_{k=0}^n a_k b_{n-k}.$$
 
kai_sikorski said:
+ \frac{A}{2} \left( I + B + \frac{1}{2} B^2 + \frac{1}{6} B^3 + \ldots \right)

I think it should be an A2 instead of A this line..

However, it made sense now. Thank you so much! Very helpful :smile:
 
Paalfaal said:
I think it should be an A2 instead of A this line..

However, it made sense now. Thank you so much! Very helpful :smile:

You are correct.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top