Proof of Inequalities: Tips and Tricks for Checking Accuracy

  • Thread starter Thread starter phillyolly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequalities Proof
phillyolly
Messages
157
Reaction score
0
 

Attachments

  • attempt.jpg
    attempt.jpg
    5.5 KB · Views: 429
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, there is a typo in the second step of your solution, you lost your epsilon on the right hand side of the inequality.

Second, this is an "if and only if" statement, which means you need to prove the forward direction (Assume |x-a|<e and show a-e < x < a+e) and the backward direction (which you did). In this case the steps are all reversible, but for ''if an only if" statements in general, you need to show both directions.
 
Following your recommendation, the only way I see the forward direction happening, is to write my expression in an opposite order.
 
phillyolly said:
Following your recommendation, the only way I see the forward direction happening, is to write my expression in an opposite order.

Right, as I said, in this proof the steps are reversible. In general for "if and only if" proofs though, this is not the case; the forward and backward direction proofs will be different.

EDIT: Check out the proof under "Example: Division" for an illustration of what I mean: http://zimmer.csufresno.edu/~larryc/proofs/proofs.ifandonlyif.html
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top