Proof of Nonsingular Matrices: Linear Algebra

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the proof of whether the product of two nonsingular matrices, A and B, is also nonsingular and whether the inverse of the product can be expressed as (AB)⁻¹ = A⁻¹B⁻¹. The original poster mistakenly equates A with its inverse and attempts to prove the property using this incorrect assumption. It is clarified that nonsingular means there exists an inverse such that AA⁻¹ = I, and the correct relationship for the inverse of a product is (AB)⁻¹ = B⁻¹A⁻¹, not A⁻¹B⁻¹. The poster is advised to revisit the definitions and properties of matrix inverses to correct their proof approach. Understanding these fundamental concepts is crucial for proving the nonsingularity of matrix products.
Mdhiggenz
Messages
324
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


http://i48.tinypic.com/2qu14ax.jpg

Can you guys explain whether or not my proof would be sufficient. My thought process was to start with the definition.

So if A is nonsingular is means that A has an inverse such that

A=A-. I used that same thinking for B. B=B-

Then using the question which states. IF A and B are nonsingular nxn matrices then AB is also nonsingular and (AB)-=A-B-

I thought it would be easier to prove the right side so I started with AB=A-B-

and used the relationship A=A- and B=B- to show that both sides are equal. However I found the proof online, and they did something slightly different.

Am I incorrect, if so where did I go wrong in my thinking?

Thanks

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Non-singular does not mean that A = A-1

It means that there is an inverse A-1 such that AA-1 = A-1A = I
 
And (AB)-1 = B-1A-1, not A-1B-1
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K