mess1n
- 24
- 0
Hey, I've come across a part of my notes which states:
I understand that if \ell = 0, then what's left is detA = \ell^{1}\ell^{2}...\ell^{p}. Or at least, I assume that's what my lecturer is getting at.
What I don't understand is why the \ell in the characteristic equation (A-\ellE) is the same as the \ell's in the (\ell^{p} - \ell), but not the same as the \ell^{p}'s in (\ell^{p} - \ell).
Why doesn't detA = 0 ?
I'd really appreciate any help.
[note: I couldn't find a lambda symbol so I had to use \ell instead]
Cheers,
Andrew
Statement:The determinant of a matrix is equal to the product of all its eigenvalues:
Proof: We know that, after opening up the determinant of A - \ellE, we get a polynomial algebraic equation in \ell which has solutions \ell^{1},...,\ell^{p}, i.e. one can write:
det(A-\ellE) = (\ell^{1} - \ell)...(\ell^{p} - \ell)
By putting \ell = 0 in the above equation, we can obtain the desired result.
I understand that if \ell = 0, then what's left is detA = \ell^{1}\ell^{2}...\ell^{p}. Or at least, I assume that's what my lecturer is getting at.
What I don't understand is why the \ell in the characteristic equation (A-\ellE) is the same as the \ell's in the (\ell^{p} - \ell), but not the same as the \ell^{p}'s in (\ell^{p} - \ell).
Why doesn't detA = 0 ?
I'd really appreciate any help.
[note: I couldn't find a lambda symbol so I had to use \ell instead]
Cheers,
Andrew