Proof of Tan (theta) = 1 + (2M / m)

  • Thread starter Thread starter daniel123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Tan Theta
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the equation Tan(theta) = 1 + (2M/m) in a physics context involving two different masses in equilibrium. The setup includes three tension forces acting on the masses, with angles of 45 degrees on either side of the smaller mass. Clarifications are sought regarding the relationship between the masses and the tension forces, as well as the specifics of the angles involved. The participants emphasize the importance of accurately describing the physical situation to facilitate the proof. The conversation concludes with a focus on applying the principles of equilibrium and tension to derive the equation.
daniel123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In my Physics 231 class (Calculus Based) I was given a homework problem asking me to prove the following equation. It had a picture attached but the equation was:

Tan (theta) = 1 + (2M / m)

The two (m) represent different masses balanced in equilibrium while hanging with 3 tension forces none of which are connected to the other mass. If you need anymore information just post what you need below. Thank you.


|
/ |
/ |
| / (theta)
| /__________
| \ M
\ /
\ /
45 Degrees \ / 45 Degrees
______|______
|
m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you find your own image comprehensible? I don't.

First, describe the situation properly!

The two (m) represent different masses balanced in equilibrium while hanging with 3 tension forces none of which are connected to the other mass.

1. What is M? One of the two m's?
2. "balanced in equilibrium": By means of what??
Some sort of weight?
3. "while hanging with 3 tension forces none of which are connected to the other mass." Eeh?
First, are there any ropes in the image providing the tension?
Is each mass connected to 3 ropes?

And what, precisely, is the angle?
 
Is this the setup?

<br /> Tan (\theta) = 1 + (\frac{2M}{m})<br />

-Dave
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    3.3 KB · Views: 544
Probably!
Or, at least, congrats that you managed to get more sense out of OP's description than I did.
 
Poncho said:
Is this the setup?

<br /> Tan (\theta) = 1 + (\frac{2M}{m})<br />

-Dave

That is the setup, yes. The angles on either side of the smaller hanging mass are both 45 degrees. Sorry my drawing got messed up during the post. On my problem the angle identified as theta is the angle opposite of theta in yours.
 
Last edited:
looking at the knot that holds up m,
you find from x: T_left = T_middle ;
vertical T components total = mg.

The vertical component of T_right
has to hold up all of M and ½ of m.
(do you see the m+2M hiding?) :-p

Now write the horizontal Sum(F) =0.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top