I Proof of the Equipartition Theorem

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter dRic2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Theorem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the proof of the Equipartition Theorem (ET) and the role of the Hamiltonian in the calculations. A key point is the assumption that the constant ##b## can depend on other coordinates and momenta, which complicates the integral for calculating the average of ##bp_i^2##. However, it is clarified that the integral can still factorize if ##b## does not depend on ##p_i##, allowing for simplification. The normalization factor from the partition function is crucial for obtaining the correct form of the equipartition theorem. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding how to handle dependencies in the Hamiltonian while performing the calculations.
dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
The proof for the ET I've found in some of the undergrad books for statistical physics (for example in Reif's "Statistical and Thermal Physics") assumes the form of the Hamiltonian of the system to be:
$$H = bp_i^2 + E'(q_1,...,p_f)$$
where ##b## is a constant.
My professor in his notes, says that ##b## can be a function of all the coordinates and momenta as long as it does not depend on the i-th term, i.e., ##b = b(q_j, p_{j \neq i})##. I fail to understand the proof however. Since now ##b## is a function of the generalized coordinates and momenta the integral
$$<bp_i^2> = \int d^{3f}q d^{3f}p bp_i^2 e^{-\beta H}$$
no longer factorizes.
In his notes he just says that recalling that the integral in ##p_i## is the second moment of a Gaussian we immediately obtain ##<bp_i^2> = \frac 1 2 k_B T##. But I am unable to perform the calculations.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

thanks
Ric
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But the integral factorizes. If ##b## doesn't depend on ##p_i## you have
$$\langle b p_i^2 \rangle=\frac{1}{Z} \int \mathrm{d}^{3f}q \mathrm{d}^{3f-3} p b \exp(-\beta H') \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d}^3 p_i p_i^2 \exp[-\beta b p_i^2] ,$$
where the last integral leaves out the ##p_i## integration, which is done explicitly and ##H'## just omits the term ##b p_i^2##. Also don't forget the normalization factor, i.e., the partition sum which cancels all the stuff you omit to get the equipartition theorem in the given form.
 
vanhees71 said:
don't forget the normalization factor
Sorry, my fault.

vanhees71 said:
But the integral factorizes ...
...
...
the partition sum which cancels all the stuff you omit to get the equipartition theorem in the given form.
Still I don't get it. ##b## depends on all the other coordinates, so how can you simplify the remaining therms?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top