Proof: Quadratic Nth Term of Sequence Indicates Arithmetic Progression

  • Thread starter Thread starter zorro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence Term
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the claim that if the nth term of a sequence is a quadratic expression in n, then the sequence is an arithmetic progression (A.P.). Participants argue that while the differences between terms of a quadratic sequence can form an arithmetic sequence, the original quadratic sequence itself is not an A.P. Examples provided include sequences like {n^2} and their differences, which are not constant. Clarification is made that if the sum of a sequence is a quadratic function of n, then the original sequence is indeed an arithmetic progression. The conversation emphasizes the distinction between the terms of a quadratic sequence and the differences between those terms.
zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Is this statement correct?

If the nth term of a sequence is a quadratic expression in n, then the sequence is an A.P.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Take arbitrary t(n)=n^2-2n-2
I substituted 1,2,3 in the above expression and noted the c.d.
It is not constant.
But the book says that this statement is correct.
Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The book's statement doesn't seem correct to me. The simplest sequence that fits the description is an = {n2} = {1, 4, 9, 16, ..., n2, ...} This is definitely not an arithmetic sequence for the reason you stated - the difference between pairs of successive terms is not constant.
 
Thanks!
 
If the terms of a sequence are from a quadratic formula, then the difference between the nth and (n-1)st terms form an arithmetic progression.

For example if the sequence is 1,4,9,16,25,...

then the differences are

4-1, 9-4, 16-9, 25-16,...
3,5,7,9,...

That might be what they meant to refer to
 
It is true only in case on n^2 (may be in some other cases too).
But if you take an expression like n^2 +2n-1, then Tn- T(n-1)=2n is not independent of n i.e. it is not a constant.
 
The sequence whose nth term is 2n is an arithmetic progression
 
You did not get me. In my expression, 2n is the difference between two consecutive terms of the sequence. It is not the nth term.
If you take nth term of the sequence as 2n, it violates the question as it is not a quadratic expression.
 
What I said is that the sequence whose nth term is the difference between consecutive terms of the quadratic sequence is an arithmetic progression. So for your example, the nth term of the sequence I'm describing is T(n)-T(n-1), and this new sequence is an arithmetic progression
 
If the sum (form i= 1 to n) of a sequence of numbers is a quadratic function of n, then the sequence is arthmetic.
 
  • #10
Can you give an example?
 
  • #11
HallsofIvy said:
If the sum (form i= 1 to n) of a sequence of numbers is a quadratic function of n, then the sequence is arthmetic.

Abdul Quadeer said:
Can you give an example?
The sum of the first n integers.
\sum_{k= 1}^n k = \frac{n(n + 1)}{2}
 
  • #12
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top