Proof that d/dx is anti-hermitian by integration by parts

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the derivative operator d/dx is anti-Hermitian using integration by parts. Participants clarify that the term ψ*ψ is not a constant unless integrated over all space, and it vanishes at infinity for normalizable wave functions. They emphasize that for periodic boundary conditions, the values at the boundaries are equal, leading to the integral evaluating to zero. The conversation also highlights the importance of limits in integration and the behavior of wave functions at infinity. Overall, the proof hinges on the decay of wave functions and the properties of integrals under specific boundary conditions.
HotMintea
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
The attempt at a solution

<br /> \begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \ -\ i\int\psi^* \frac{\partial{\psi}}{\partial x}= \\ -i(\psi^*\psi\ - \int\psi \frac{\partial\psi^*}{\partial x})\space\ (?)<br /> \end{split}<br /> \end{equation*}<br />

I thought \psi^*\psi\ = \ constant\neq\ 0. However, it vanishes in the correct proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi HotMintea! :smile:

Not sure what this is :redface:, but doesn't [constant]ab = 0 ?
 
As tiny-tim pointed out, you need limits of integration.

However, psi*psi is not a constant. It is only a constant when integrated over all space, but it is not integrated in this case.

The real reason the first term vanishes is that for limits at plus or minus infinity, the wave-function must decay to 0 to be normalizable. For periodic boundary conditions, the two limits are the same point so they must subtract to 0.
 
Hi tiny-tim and Matterwave! :smile:
Matterwave said:
As tiny-tim pointed out, you need limits of integration.

tiny-tim said:
Not sure what this is :redface:, but doesn't [constant]ab = 0 ?

For a decaying wave function, is the following correct?:
<br /> \begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \ -\ i\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi^*\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\ =\\-\ i\ (\psi^*\psi\ |_{-\infty}^{\infty} - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \psi\frac{\partial \psi^*}{\partial x})\ = \\ i\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\psi\frac{\partial\psi^*}{\partial x}<br /> \end{split}<br /> \end{equation*}<br />
Matterwave said:
The real reason the first term vanishes is that for limits at plus or minus infinity, the wave-function must decay to 0 to be normalizable.
Thus, \psi\ = \ 0 \ at \ x\ = -\infty\ \ and \ \infty?
Matterwave said:
For periodic boundary conditions, the two limits are the same point so they must subtract to 0.
For periodic boundary conditions, \ -\ i\int_{a}^{a} \psi^*\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\ = \ i\int_{a}^{a}\psi\frac{\partial\psi^*}{\partial x}\ = \ 0 ?
Matterwave said:
However, psi*psi is not a constant. It is only a constant when integrated over all space, but it is not integrated in this case.

For \psi\ = \ Ae^{i(k x-\omega t)} where A is an arbitrary constant, \psi^* \psi\ = \ A^2 \ = \ constant. Is \psi^* \psi\ = \ constant not true in general? (Example taken from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normalizable_wave_function#Example_of_normalization)
 
Last edited:
Hi HotMintea! :smile:
HotMintea said:
Thus, \psi\ = \ 0 \ at \ x\ = -\infty\ \ and \ \infty?

Yes.
For periodic boundary conditions, \ -\ i\int_{a}^{a} \psi^*\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\ = \ i\int_{a}^{a}\psi\frac{\partial\psi^*}{\partial x}\ = \ 0 ?

No, \psi is the same (at each boundary), so the [] is zero, not the ∫.
For \psi\ = \ Ae^{i(k x-\omega t)} where A is an arbitrary constant, \psi^* \psi\ = \ A^2 \ = \ constant. Is \psi^* \psi\ = \ constant not true in general?

That's a featureless plane wave, so of course \psi^* \psi is constant.

Not all waves are so uninteresting. :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Not all waves are so uninteresting. :wink:
:wink:!
tiny-tim said:
No, \psi is the same (at each boundary), so the [] is zero, not the ∫.
For the periodic boundary conditions, is the following correct?:
<br /> \begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \ -\ i\int_{a}^{b} \psi^*\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\ = -\ i\ (\psi^*\psi\ |_{a}^{b} - \int_{a}^{b}\psi\frac{\partial\psi^*}{\partial x})\ <br /> \end{split}<br /> \end{equation*}<br />
However, \psi(a)\ = \psi(b). Moreover, conjugates \psi^*(a)\ = \psi^*(b). Thus, \psi^*\psi\ |_{a}^{b}\ = \ 0.

Therefore,
\begin{equation*}\begin{split} -\ i\int_{a}^{b} \psi^*\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\ = \ i\int_{a}^{b}\psi\frac{\partial\psi^*}{\partial x} \end{split}\end{equation*}
 
Last edited:
Yes! :smile:
 
Thanks for your help! :smile:
 
Back
Top