Proof that Determinant is Multiplicative for Commutative Rings

Site
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Is there a nice way to show that Det(AB)=Det(A)Det(B) where A and B are n x n matrices over a commutative ring?

I'm hoping there is some analogue to the construction for vector spaces that defines the determinant in a natural way using alternating multilinear mappings...

Otherwise would you just have to bash out the identity using the Leibniz formula for the determinant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\det## is just a homomorphism from the group of linear maps on ##V## to its representation on the top exterior power ##\Lambda^n V##. Taking some ##v_i \in V##, we have ##\det A : \Lambda^n V \to \Lambda^n V## given by

(\det A)(v_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge v_n) = A(v_1) \wedge \ldots \wedge A(v_n)
From here it is easy to show ##\det AB = \det A \det B## by using the usual composition of linear maps on each factor in the wedge product on the right.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, Ben. To clarify, do you mean that we set ##V=R^n ## so that the group of linear maps on ##V## is the set of ##n##x##n## matrices?

Also, do you know of a textbook that explains exterior algebra (from the module perspective) and its connections to the determinant from the ground up?
 
V can be any vector space at all.
 
Site said:
Is there a nice way to show that Det(AB)=Det(A)Det(B) where A and B are n x n matrices over a commutative ring?

I'm hoping there is some analogue to the construction for vector spaces that defines the determinant in a natural way using alternating multilinear mappings...

Otherwise would you just have to bash out the identity using the Leibniz formula for the determinant?

Maybe you can first show (not too hard) , that the determinant is multiplicative for elementary matrices Ei . Then write B as a product of elementary matrices
and rearrange.
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top