Proof that Determinant is Multiplicative for Commutative Rings

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the proof of the multiplicative property of the determinant for n x n matrices over a commutative ring, specifically exploring whether there exists a natural construction analogous to that in vector spaces using alternating multilinear mappings.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about a natural way to show that Det(AB) = Det(A)Det(B) for matrices over a commutative ring, suggesting a possible connection to alternating multilinear mappings.
  • Another participant explains that the determinant can be viewed as a homomorphism from the group of linear maps on a vector space to its representation on the top exterior power, providing a method to demonstrate the multiplicative property using the composition of linear maps.
  • A participant seeks clarification on whether the vector space V can be taken as R^n and asks for textbook recommendations on exterior algebra from the module perspective.
  • Another participant asserts that V can be any vector space, not limited to R^n.
  • A repeated inquiry suggests starting the proof by establishing the multiplicative property for elementary matrices before extending it to general matrices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various approaches to proving the multiplicative property of the determinant, but no consensus is reached on a single method or framework. Multiple competing views and suggestions remain present in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the properties of determinants and linear maps, but these assumptions are not fully explored or resolved. The dependence on definitions of vector spaces and modules is also implied but not explicitly stated.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in linear algebra, determinants, and the connections between algebraic structures and geometric interpretations may find this discussion relevant.

Site
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Is there a nice way to show that Det(AB)=Det(A)Det(B) where A and B are n x n matrices over a commutative ring?

I'm hoping there is some analogue to the construction for vector spaces that defines the determinant in a natural way using alternating multilinear mappings...

Otherwise would you just have to bash out the identity using the Leibniz formula for the determinant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\det## is just a homomorphism from the group of linear maps on ##V## to its representation on the top exterior power ##\Lambda^n V##. Taking some ##v_i \in V##, we have ##\det A : \Lambda^n V \to \Lambda^n V## given by

(\det A)(v_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge v_n) = A(v_1) \wedge \ldots \wedge A(v_n)
From here it is easy to show ##\det AB = \det A \det B## by using the usual composition of linear maps on each factor in the wedge product on the right.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, Ben. To clarify, do you mean that we set ##V=R^n ## so that the group of linear maps on ##V## is the set of ##n##x##n## matrices?

Also, do you know of a textbook that explains exterior algebra (from the module perspective) and its connections to the determinant from the ground up?
 
V can be any vector space at all.
 
Site said:
Is there a nice way to show that Det(AB)=Det(A)Det(B) where A and B are n x n matrices over a commutative ring?

I'm hoping there is some analogue to the construction for vector spaces that defines the determinant in a natural way using alternating multilinear mappings...

Otherwise would you just have to bash out the identity using the Leibniz formula for the determinant?

Maybe you can first show (not too hard) , that the determinant is multiplicative for elementary matrices Ei . Then write B as a product of elementary matrices
and rearrange.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K