Proof that the legendre polynomials are orthogonal polynomials

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the orthogonality of Legendre polynomials, particularly in the context of their application to numerical integration via Gaussian quadrature. Participants explore how to demonstrate that Legendre polynomials are orthogonal to all lower-degree polynomials with respect to a specific weight function.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that Legendre polynomials are orthogonal to all polynomials of lower degree, expressed mathematically as ∫_{-1}^{1} L_n(x) P_m(x) dx = 0 for m < n.
  • Another participant questions the clarity of the term "set" in reference to orthogonal polynomials and seeks clarification on the definition.
  • A participant asserts that any polynomial of degree m can be represented as a linear combination of Legendre polynomials of degree at most m.
  • One participant proposes that the linear independence of Legendre polynomials of degree ≤ n allows for the expression of any polynomial of degree ≤ n as a linear combination of these polynomials, leading to the conclusion that the inner product with lower-degree polynomials results in zero.
  • A later reply expresses gratitude for the clarification provided by the previous argument.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple viewpoints regarding the proof of orthogonality and the representation of polynomials, with no consensus reached on the specific definitions or implications of the terms used.

Contextual Notes

Participants do not fully resolve the definitions of the "set" of orthogonal polynomials or the implications of linear combinations, leaving some assumptions and dependencies unaddressed.

center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2
I'm now studying the application of legendre polynomials to numerical integration in the so called gaussian quadrature. There one exploits the fact that an orthogonal polynomial of degree n is orthogonal to all other polynomials of degree less than n with respect to some weight function. For legendre polynomials that must mean that

\int_{-1}^{1} L_n(x) P_m(x) dx = 0

for all P(x) where m is less than n. How does one prove that the legendre polynomials are in the set of such orthogonal polynomials? It's okay that they are orthogonal among themselves, but I wonder how to show that they are orthogonal to everyone else with lower degree?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How does one prove that the legendre polynomials are in the set of such orthogonal polynomials?

This is unclear. What is the set you are referring to?

It's okay that they are orthogonal among themselves, but I wonder how to show that they are orthogonal to everyone else with lower degree?

Any polynomial of degree m can be represented as a linear combination of Legendre polynomials of degree at most m.
 
show that the legendre polynomials of degree ≤ n, are linearly independent, and thus form a basis for all polynomials of degree ≤ n.

therefore, every polynomial of degree ≤ n can be written as a linear combination of the Lj (j = 0,1,2,...,n):

P_m(x) = a_0L_0(x) + \dots + a_nL_n(x)

which will make the only surviving term in the inner product the nth one:

\int_{-1}^1L_n(x)a_nL_n(x) dx

but if Pm is of degree < n, the coefficient an of Ln will be 0.
 
Ah, thanks! That was the argument I was looking for.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K