Proof with Darboux integral - question.

  • Thread starter Thread starter peripatein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Proof
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
peripatein
Messages
868
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Homework Statement


I was asked to prove that for f(x), Riemann integrable and bounded from above by real number M:
∫[a,b] f(x) < M(b-a)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Since f(x) is Riemann integrable, ∫[a,b] f(x) must be equal to both the lower and upper Darboux sums. Therefore: ∫[a,b] f(x) = supf(x) [a,b]Ʃ[i=1,n]Δxi = supf(x) [a,b](b-a) <= M(b-a)
I am really not sure this is rigorous enough, or even how it ought to be approached. I'd appreciate some guidance please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this can be seen as a consequence of the integral mean value theorem.