Proofing that All Arcs of a Circle = 360 Degrees

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that all arcs of a circle sum to 360 degrees, paralleling the established fact that the angles of a triangle total 180 degrees. Participants express the need for a solid motivation for each step in the proof, emphasizing that simply stating "a lap is 360 degrees" lacks depth. There is acknowledgment that while the 360-degree system is standard, alternative systems, such as a 400-degree system, have existed. The importance of maintaining a structured approach in proofs is highlighted, particularly in educational contexts. Ultimately, the conversation underscores the need for clarity and justification in mathematical proofs.
Dousin12
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Im doing a proof. For instance all sums of a triangle add upp to 180 degrees. But how to i motivate that all arcs on a circle add up to 360 degrees.

A part of my proof is that Arc A + B + C = 360 degrees.

But i don't know what to write in the column that motivates every step. ! Like a lap is 360 degrees dosent sound good enough
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually we just say, angles at a point sum to 360o
I think that is a definition of degrees.
 
Dousin12 said:
Im doing a proof. For instance all sums of a triangle add upp to 180 degrees. But how to i motivate that all arcs on a circle add up to 360 degrees.

A part of my proof is that Arc A + B + C = 360 degrees.

But i don't know what to write in the column that motivates every step. ! Like a lap is 360 degrees dosent sound good enough
In future posts, please don't delete the homework template. Its use is required.
 
Merlin3189 said:
Usually we just say, angles at a point sum to 360o
I think that is a definition of degrees.

Very much this.
 
pasmith said:
Very much this.

This is true. We have chosen to use a 360degree system for a circle but other systems like a 400 degree system (have) exist(ed) as well.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top