Propagating a Gaussian-Profile EM Wave in a Medium

andrew300591
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi everyone,

As part of my final year project I am modelling the propagation of an electromagnetic wave through a medium of refractive index, n. I begin at the boundary between vacuum and the medium, x = 0 and propagate forward to some distance x.

I have initially tried modelling a vacuum throughout i.e. n = 1. In this case I expected that the initial Gaussian wave should propagate forward unchanged, however I have not been able to achieve this result - could you please help me find out why?

I am attempting this issue in the Python programming language.

Homework Equations


(1) E(x=0,t) = e^(-0.5 * (t / τ)**2)
(2) E(ω,t) = F[E(x=0,t)]
(3) E(ω,t) * e^(ikz) = E(ω,t) * e^(iωnz/c)
(4) E(x,t) = F^-1[E(ω,t) * e^(iωnz/c)]
* F[] represents a forward Fourier transform, F^-1[] represents an inverse Fourier transform
** τ represents the width of the initial Gaussian profile, I have set τ = 1

The Attempt at a Solution


So far to do this I have tried:

(i) I begin with a wave profile, E(x=0,t) that is Gaussian in time (equation 1 below)
(ii) Perform a forward Fourier transform (equation 2) to calculate the angular spectrum of the initial Gaussian profile
(iii) Multiply the angular spectrum by an exponential factor (equation 3) to propagate forward in space
(iv) Inverse Fourier transform the product of the exponential and the forward Fourier transform to obtain the wave profile at distance x, E(x,t)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(equation 4)However my results do not match the expected result of the wave profile being unchanged. I would be grateful if someone could help me identify where I'm going wrong.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top