Propane to Plutonium Conversions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arctic Fox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Propane
AI Thread Summary
Thermoelectric Generators can effectively operate on gasoline and propane, raising the question of converting them to use heat from radioactive fuels. The discussion highlights that any decaying isotopes produce heat, which can generate power without a controlled reaction, similar to how some space probes operate. Thick lead shielding is suggested as a primary safety measure, although it may not be strictly necessary if the device is buried. The conversation emphasizes the potential for using naturally decaying radioactive materials for energy generation. Overall, the topic explores the feasibility and safety considerations of such conversions.
Arctic Fox
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
LOL!

There are Thermoelectric Generators that work on gasoline and/or propane that seem to work quite well on those fuels.

How hard would it be to convert these to operate from the heat of radioactive fuels? (provided that the fuels were available)

Thick lead shielding, I suppose, would be on the top of the list. What else would have to be done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm surprised that no one was drawn into this thread by your question, even over the course of so many months. The question is actually quite interesting.

Any decaying isotopes generate an amount of heat, which can then be used to generate power without the need for a controlled reaction, or any reaction at all. In fact, many space probes (voyager 1, voyager 2, cassini, etc) generate their power in this way, as the sun tends to be too distant for the use of solar panels.

Provided that fuels are readily available, you seem correct that shielding would be first priority. The fuel itself need not be maintained or controlled in any way- it is simply required to exist and decay naturally as all radioactive substances do. Without a reaction occurring, lead sheilding might not be necessary, though some protection will be needed. Alternatively, the entire device could simply be buried in the ground.

Come on people, you know that you've all allways wanted a nuclear device burried in your backyards!
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top