Properties of Inverse Matrices

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the properties of inverse matrices, specifically examining which formulas hold for all invertible nxn matrices A and B. Counterexamples were found for formulas A, B, and F, indicating they do not hold universally. The validity of formulas C, D, and E is debated, with C being confirmed as true since the inverse of A^5 remains invertible. D is noted to hold only under certain conditions, while E is derived from the distribution property of matrices. The conversation highlights the complexity of proving these properties and the importance of counterexamples in linear algebra.
tigger1989
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Determine which of the formulas hold for all invertible nxn matrices A and B

A. AB=BA
B. (A+A^–1)^8=A^8+A^–8
C. A^5 is invertible
D. A+A^–1 is invertible
E. (In+A)(In+A^–1)=2In+A+A^–1 (where In is the identity matrix)
F. (A+B)^2=A^2+B^2+2AB

I was able to find counterexamples to prove A and B and F incorrect. However, the webwork program (designed for practicing basic Linear Algebra) I am using states that C, D, and E are not all correct ... what am I missing?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The ones that are false all have trivial counterexamples. What have you tried so far?
 
zhentil said:
The ones that are false all have trivial counterexamples. What have you tried so far?
Hi, I'm a little rusty on Linear Algebra, so forgive my ignorance on some of the approaches. Can you elaborate by what you mean by "trivial"?

I tried random matrices (often with easy numbers, such as the identity matrix) for A, B, C, D, E, and F, but only found counterexamples for A, B, and F (but knowing for a fact that C, D, and E are not all correct).

By one of the simple properties of inverse matrices, I am almost certain that C is correct.
 
Last edited:
C is true, since otherwise A^(-1) is not invertible in the first place, with A^{-5}=A^{-1}...A^{-1} hence if the determinant is zero then one of them has also a zero determinant.

D holds only for reals and from the positive eigenvalues of A^(2) .trace(A^2)>0, \det(A^2)>0
<br /> (A+A^{-1})= (I+A^{2})A^{-1} = (A(I+A^{2})^{-1})^{-1}<br />

E follows from the distribution property,

I think I have to sleep so what is the the counterexample for F?
 
Last edited:
Any two matrices that do not commute will give an counterexample to F.
 
Haha, Of course! That was lame, sorry!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top