Proportion of atmospheric Carbon 14

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the proportion of Carbon 14 in the atmosphere, given its half-life of 5730 years and an activity level of 255 Bq/Kg. Participants express confusion over the calculations, particularly regarding the decay constant and the relationship between activity and the expected number of decays. There is a suggestion that the age of the universe is irrelevant to the current atmospheric Carbon 14 levels. Clarification is sought on whether the 255 Bq/Kg refers to the entire atmosphere or just Carbon 14. The conversation emphasizes the need for consistent units in calculations to derive the correct proportion.
poiuy
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
The half-life of Carbon 14 is 5730 years and the activity of atmospheric carbon due to Carbon 14 is 255Bq/Kg. What proportion of atmospheric carbon atoms are Carbon 14.

Attempted solution

Decay constant for C14 = ln(2)/t(1/2) = ln(2)/5730 = 1.21x10^-4

Current activity A = A(0)exp(-1.21*10^-4 *t )
A = 255
t = age of universe = 10*10^9 years


After this I start getting silly numbers and it just doesn't work, presumably A/A(0) would give the proportion of the current atmosphere which is C14, but then again this doesn't seem to work and I am all out of ideas.

All ideas appreciated (I don't really want the answer but if somebody could point me in the right direction that would be great) :cool:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This might be better posted on the chemistry, other sciences, forum for homework help.

My first blush impression is that you need to be using the same units, in one case you're given the measured breakdown per second, and comparing it to a rate constant given in years. I don't believe that the age of the universe enters it. Instead, you have a number of events/sec, from the half life should be able to predict number of events on normalized basis, the fraction should give some idea about the percentage.

In other words say we have 1,000,000 carbon 14 atoms per kg.
In 5730 years, we would expect 500,000 to decay. In a second we would expect how many to decay? We know we have 255. That proportion of actual/expected is proportional to a million. What I don't understand is if its a Kg of atmosphere or Kg of carbon 14 that's being cited.

,
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top