Finding Original Carbon nuclei from given sample.

  • Thread starter Thread starter rcubed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Carbon Nuclei
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the number of radioactive 14C nuclei in a carbon sample from an archaeological site, specifically a small animal bone fragment weighing 155g. The original ratio of radioactive 14C to stable 12C is given as 1.31×10-12.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the decay constant for 14C and its implications for calculating the age of the sample. There is uncertainty about how to apply the given ratio of 14C to 12C in the context of the problem. Some participants suggest starting with the total number of carbon nuclei to find the number of 14C nuclei using the provided ratio.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on how to approach the problem. There is recognition that the ratio of 14C to 12C is crucial for determining the number of 14C nuclei, but there is also acknowledgment of potential misinterpretations of the ratio's context. Some participants are attempting calculations based on the suggested methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem lacks specific information about the current amount of 14C in the sample, which complicates the calculations. There is also a mention of the need to clarify whether the ratio refers to the number of nuclei or their masses, as this affects the approach taken.

rcubed
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small animal bone fragment found in an archaelogical site has a carbon mass of 155g. When the animal was alive, the ratio of radioactive 146C to the stable 126C was 1.31×10-12. What was the number of 146C nuclei found in the sample when the animal was alive?


Homework Equations


None given, but I would assume:
N=N0e-λt


The Attempt at a Solution


Not too sure where to start so I got the decay constant, λ by using half life of Carbon14, 5730 Years
0.5=e-λ(5730)
λ=1.21×10-4

Then I solved the for the number of years since the animal was alive by plugging everything back into the original equation, assuming N/N0 = 1.31×10-12

t=-ln(1.31×10-12)/-1.21×10-4 = 226180 Years

Up until here I don't think I did anything wrong, but here is where I am unsure of what to do.

I tried using the same formula to solve for N0, but this time using the given 155g.

155=N0e-(1.2110-4)(226180)
N0=1.18×1014g

I don't think in doing the right thing here. Can anyone give me some guidance?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello rcubed,

Welcome to Physics Forums!
rcubed said:

Homework Statement


A small animal bone fragment found in an archaelogical site has a carbon mass of 155g. When the animal was alive, the ratio of radioactive 146C to the stable 126C was 1.31×10-12. What was the number of 146C nuclei found in the sample when the animal was alive?

Homework Equations


None given, but I would assume:
N=N0e-?t

The Attempt at a Solution


Not too sure where to start so I got the decay constant, ? by using half life of Carbon14, 5730 Years
0.5=e-?(5730)
?=1.21×10-4
Okay, you've found that
[tex]\frac{N}{N_0} = e^{-1.21 \times 10^4 \ t}[/tex]

Although I don't think that helps for this problem. (Maybe it does later in a different part of the problem not listed in the above statement).
Then I solved the for the number of years since the animal was alive by plugging everything back into the original equation, assuming N/N0 = 1.31×10-12

t=-ln(1.31×10-12)/-1.21×10-4 = 226180 Years
No, wait. You're using the 1.31×10-12 out of context. It is *not* the ratio of the final amount of 14C to the original amount of 14C.

As a matter of fact, you don't even know what the final amount of 14C is. That information is not given in the problem statement. And since the age of the animal is not given either, you can't even calculate it (at least not without additional information).

Can anyone give me some guidance?

Thanks!
All you're trying to find is the original amount of 14C (when the animal was alive). For this particular problem, don't worry about how much of the sample is 14C today, or even how old the sample is. There's not enough information given anyway.

So here is what we know. There is 155 g sample of carbon. When the animal was alive, the fraction of carbon (in terms of the ratio of the number of nuclei) that was 14C was 1.31×10-12 (Technically that number is the ratio of 14C to 12C, but it's also approximately the same ratio as the number of 14C to total). So when the animal was alive, how much of that sample was 14C?

[Hint: You might want to start by determining how many carbon nuclei (primarily 12C) are in 155 g of carbon. Then, since you know what fraction of that that was 14C, determine the number of 14C nuclei].

-------------
Edit:

By the way, I am presently interpreting the 1.31×10-12 ratio as the ratio of number of nuclei. If instead it is a ratio of masses or weights, then my advice needs to be modified to take that into account (i.e. 14C is heavier than 12C, which needs consideration).
 
Last edited:
^Thanks for the reply!

So its just simply finding the number of 12C Molecules first, then using the ratio to find the 14C?
155g/12gmol-1*NA = 7.78e24

7.78e24*1.32e-12 = 1.026e13 ?

Is that it?
 
rcubed said:
^Thanks for the reply!

So its just simply finding the number of 12C Molecules first, then using the ratio to find the 14C?
155g/12gmol-1*NA = 7.78e24

7.78e24*1.32e-12 = 1.026e13 ?

Is that it?
It looks like the right idea to me. :approve: But I think the original problem statement said that the ratio was 1.31 x 10-12 (you used 1.32 x 10-12).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K