Proportions in circular motion don't make sense.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem involving centripetal acceleration on a merry-go-round. The initial calculations incorrectly assumed velocity to be constant when comparing two riders at different distances from the center. The correct relationship in circular motion is that centripetal acceleration is proportional to the radius and the square of the angular velocity. The errors in the original approach canceled each other out, leading to the correct answer despite the flawed reasoning. Understanding that angular speed remains constant is crucial for accurate calculations in circular motion scenarios.
Scorpius
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Alright, here's the problem I'm have been given:

"A boy is riding a merry-go-round at a distance of 7.00 m from its center. The boy experiences a centripetal acceleration of 7.50 m/s2. What Centripetal acceleration is experienced by another person who is riding at a distance of 3.00 m from the center?"

After looking at this problem I started solving it using proportions. Here is what I did:

ac=Centripetal acceleration
r=radius
v= velocity

ac\propto\frac{v^2}{r}

ac\propto\frac{1}{7 m/3 m}

\frac{1}{7 m/3 m}=\frac{3}{7}

\frac{3}{7}*7.5 m/s2=3.21 m/s2

According to my worksheet, this is the correct answer.

But something about the above proportion bothers me.

When it says ac\propto\frac{1}{7m/3m} Why is Velocity one? In class we discussed that velocity of an object changes when you change "r" or the radius of the object from the center, but according to this proportion the velocity between the two boys is the same

I may need to remind you that this gave me the correct answer

What am I missing?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Velocity is not = 1.

You are missing the fact that in circular motion, v = omega * r, where omega is the angular velocity in radians/sec. For the merry-go-round, omega = constant for uniform circular motion.
 
You treated the velocity as constant (wrong), but then you misapplied the proportionality, reversing it. Your method should have given you 7/3 * 7.5. Two errors canceled out. What is constant is the angular speed, ω, so you should have used ##a_c \propto r \omega^2##.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top