MHB Prove $\angle QBR=\angle RSQ$: Geometry Challenge

AI Thread Summary
In the geometry challenge, the problem involves proving that angles QBR and RSQ are equal in a convex quadrilateral PQRS, given specific conditions involving the intersection point A of the diagonals PR and QS. The angle bisector of angle PRS intersects line QP at point B, and a condition involving products of segments is provided: AP·AR + AP·RS = AQ·AS. The discussion highlights the application of the "Power of a Point Theorem" as a useful tool in the proof. Participants share insights and diagrams to clarify the solution process. The thread emphasizes collaborative problem-solving in geometry.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $A$ be the intersection point of the diagonals $PR$ and $QS$ of a convex quadrilateral $PQRS$. The bisector of angle $PRS$ hits the line $QP$ at $B$. If $AP\cdot AR+AP\cdot RS=AQ\cdot AS$, prove that $\angle QBR=\angle RSQ$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Let $A$ be the intersection point of the diagonals $PR$ and $QS$ of a convex quadrilateral $PQRS$. The bisector of angle $PRS$ hits the line $QP$ at $B$. If $AP\cdot AR+AP\cdot RS=AQ\cdot AS$, prove that $\angle QBR=\angle RSQ$.
 

Attachments

  • Geometry Challenge.jpg
    Geometry Challenge.jpg
    38.3 KB · Views: 113
Thanks for participating, Albert and thanks for your diagram and solution!

Here is a quite similar approach that I saw that I wanted to share with the community of MHB, since it uses one theorem that I have never heard before, that is, the "Power of a Point Theorem", for those who have never heard of this theorem before, I hope you will like it "at first sight" as much as I do:
View attachment 2885

Let $N$ be the intersection of lines $BR$ and $QS$. By the angle bisector theorem applied to triangle $ARS$, we have $\dfrac{RS}{SN}=\dfrac{AR}{AN}\,\,\rightarrow\,\,RS=\dfrac{AR\cdot SN}{AN}$.

Substitute this into the given relation, we then have

$\begin{align*}AQ\cdot RS&=AP\cdot AR+AP\cdot RS\\&=AP\cdot AR+\dfrac{AP\cdot AR\cdot SN}{AN}\\&=AP\cdot AR\left(1+\dfrac{SN}{AN}\right)\\&=AP\cdot AR \cdot \dfrac{AS}{AN}\end{align*}$

Simplify this gives $AQ\cdot AN=AP\cdot AR$.

Because $A$ lies inside quadrilateral $PQRN$, the Power of a Point theorem implies $P,\,Q,\,R,\,N$ are concyclic. Hence $\alpha=\angle BQS=\angle PQN\stackrel{\small \text{angle subtended on the same arc}}{=}\angle PRN\stackrel{\small \text{angle bisector theorem}}{=}\angle NRS=\angle BRS$. This implies that $B,\,Q,\,R,\,S$ are concyclic. Therefore $\angle QBR=\angle RSQ$.
 

Attachments

  • geometry challenge.JPG
    geometry challenge.JPG
    13.3 KB · Views: 91
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top