Prove Binary System Brighter by 3/4 Magnitude Than Single Star

AI Thread Summary
A binary star system of equal mass and temperature is proposed to be brighter than a single star by 3/4 magnitude. The discussion revolves around using the formula (m1-m2)=-2.5log(f1/f2) to establish this relationship. It is clarified that for a binary system, the flux ratio f1/f2 is 1, while for a single star, it is 0.5. This leads to the conclusion that the binary system's brightness can be effectively compared to the single star's brightness. The calculations confirm that the binary system is indeed brighter by the expected magnitude.
sheepcountme
Messages
80
Reaction score
1
I have to prove that a binary system of stars of equal mass, temp, etc. is brighter by a magnitude of 3/4 than a single star of equal mass, temp, etc.

I've been trying to work it out with (m1-m2)=-2.5log(f1/f2)

Might anyone be able to tell me if I am even on the right track?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Sure. So what's f1/f2 for a binary system versus a single star?
 
Well, f1/f2 for a binary is 1, but how do I compare that to a single star?
 
Let me rephrase that. You want to compare the binary system (system 1) to the single star single (system 2). So, let f1 be the flux of the binary system, and let f2 be the flux of a single star. Then what's f1/f2?
 
Ah! so if f1/f2, is 1/.5 it works! Thank you!
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top