Prove/Disprove: F1 and F2 Isomorphic as Fields

  • Thread starter Thread starter T-O7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
T-O7
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hey all,
I need to prove (or disprove) the following statement:

F1 and F2 are two finite field extensions of a field K. Assume [F1:K]=[F2:K]. Then F1 and F2 are isomorphic as fields.

Some help would be much appreciated.
I know the statement is false if i replace "isomorphic as fields" by "isomorphic as field extensions", but that's all i can think of so far.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thats obviously false. look at any example at all.

just extend your proof from field extensions, to fields.
 
Sorry...i don't know what you mean.
I can come up with counter examples if it said "isomorphic as field extensions", because then i can just use the result that F(a) and F(b) are F-isomorphic iff a and b have the same irreducible poly.
But I'm stuck in this case, with general field isomorphisms...
 
Ok here's a counterexample. Take the two field extension of the rationals \mathbb{Q}(i) and \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{3}i). Both are of degree 2. But then there is an isomorphism f(0) = f(i^2 +1) = (f(i))^2 +f(1) = (f(i))^2 +1 But there are no elements in \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{3}i) that satisfies this.
 
Nice...that's wonderful. Thanks snoble! Exploit the isomorphism property, i get it. :smile:
 
my hint was meant to get you to consider a base field like Q where every isomorphism is the identity, then your same proof works as for extensions. see?

by the way try the same problem for finite fields. i.e. suppose two finite fields have the same number of elements, what then?
 
Last edited:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top