Prove Invertibility of I+A When A^k=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter kidsmoker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the invertibility of the matrix I + A, where A is an nxn matrix satisfying A^k = 0 for some natural integer k. Participants suggest using algebraic manipulation rather than determinants to construct the inverse. A key hint involves the expression (I + A)(I - A + A^2 - A^3 + ... + (-A)^{k-1}), which simplifies due to the property A^k = 0. This approach draws parallels to the geometric series, emphasizing the finite nature of the series in the matrix context. Ultimately, the discussion leads to a constructive method for demonstrating the invertibility of I + A.
kidsmoker
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let A be an nxn matrix such that A^k=0 for some natural integer k (0 is the nxn zero matrix). Show that I + A is invertible, where I is the nxn identity matrix.

Homework Equations



Invertible implies det(I+A) not equal zero.

The Attempt at a Solution



I really don't know where to start with this one. I can see that A itself must be non-invertible, but I can't seem to get any more conditions on A based on that fact that A^k=0. Could anyone give me a hint please?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A hint :
I-A^k=(I+A)(I-A+A^2-A^3+...+(-A)^{k-1})
 
kidsmoker said:
Let A be an nxn matrix such that A^k=0 for some natural integer k (0 is the nxn zero matrix). Show that I + A is invertible, where I is the nxn identity matrix.

Invertible implies det(I+A) not equal zero.

Hi kidsmoker! :smile:

Forget determinants … use algebra, and construct an inverse!

Hint: I = I - Ak :wink:

Edit: ooh, boaz … that's too near a complete solution! :wink:
 
To get you thinking, suppose A^3 = 0. What happens when you fully multiply and collect terms for the product

<br /> (I + A) (I - A + A^2) <br />

Use the distributive rule for multiplication, remember that A^3 = 0. If you make this work, you will have the idea for general case. (The pattern should remind you of the geometric series for numbers:

<br /> \frac 1 {1 + x} = 1 -x + x^2 - x^3 + \dots<br />

with the big difference that the matrix problem doesn't involve an infinite series.)
 
Man, some of these other people are FAST on the keyboard.
 
Okay thanks you guys, got it :p
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top