Prove RO is Congruent to AR: Reasons Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter xashleyx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that line RO is congruent to line AR using given geometric conditions. Key points include the use of perpendicular lines, right triangles, and the Angle-Angle-Side (AAS) postulate to establish triangle congruence. The participants clarify the definitions of segment bisectors and the AAS postulate, emphasizing that two angles and a nonincluded side being congruent is sufficient for triangle congruence. The correct reasoning for the proof is confirmed to be option a, with a correction noted for the congruence of angles in the triangles. The conversation concludes with a reaffirmation of the AAS postulate's applicability in the proof.
xashleyx
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
yeah, sorry. I'm in a desperate bind. i have like 8 different assignments due wednesday, and i don't know how to do any of them, and my teacher in summer school couldn't help me.

sub9-1.jpg


Given: AF is perpendicular to AR; OG is perpendicular to RO; AO bisects FG

Prove: RO is congruent AR

Statement:

1. AF is perpendicular to AR; OG is perpendicular to RO

2. angle A and angle O are right triangles

3. triangleFAR and triangleGOR are right triangles

4. AO bisects FG (Given)

5. RG is congruent to RF

6. triangle FRA is congruent to triangle GRO

7. triangleFAR and triangleGOR are congruent

8. RO is congruent to AR

Choose the correct reasons for the statements above.

a.1. Given; 2. Definition of perpendicular lines; 3. Definition of right triangles; 5. AAS postulate; 6. Vertical angle theorem; 7. Segment bisector; 8. CPCTC

b.1. Given; 2. Definition of perpendicular lines; 3. Definition of right triangles; 5. Segment bisector; 6. Vertical angle theorem; 7. AAS postulate; 8. CPCTC

c. 1. Given; 2. Definition of vertical angles; 3. Definition of right angles; 5. AAS postulate; 6. Segment bisector; 7. Vertical angle theorem; 8. CPCTC

i said it was a.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First, #6 should read angle FRA is congruent to angle GRO.

a, b, and c are the same up until #5. What does the AAS postulate say and what does it mean to say something is a segment bisector?
 
If two angles & a nonincluded side of one triangle are congruent to two angles & the corresponding nonincluded side of a second triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.

a segment that divides a line into two equal parts.

so i think this makes 5 a segment bisector.
& makes 7. aas.

sorry if I'm being really stupid.
 
so i think this makes 5 a segment bisector.
& makes 7. aas.
Yes, that's right.

Actually in the AAS it doesn't matter whether the side is nonincluded or not--if you know 2 angles are the same between the two triangles you also know the 3rd angle is the same.
 
thank you very much.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top