Prove \sin(\alpha+\beta)<\sin\alpha+\sin\beta: Intuition & Proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kamataat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Trig
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the inequality \(\sin(\alpha+\beta) < \sin\alpha + \sin\beta\) for \(\alpha, \beta \in (0, \pi/2)\). Participants agree that the positive values of \(\cos\alpha\) and \(\cos\beta\) are crucial, as they ensure that \(\sin(\alpha+\beta)\) is less than the sum of the sines. The proof is supported by using the identity \(\sin(\alpha+\beta) = \sin\alpha \cos\beta + \cos\alpha \sin\beta\) and demonstrating that this expression is bounded by \(\sin\alpha + \sin\beta\). Additionally, it is noted that the equality holds only when both angles approach zero. The conversation highlights the importance of the non-negativity of sine in the specified domain for the validity of the inequality.
Kamataat
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
Let \alpha,\beta\in]0;\pi/2[. Prove that \sin(\alpha+\beta)&lt;\sin\alpha+\sin\beta.

My intuition says it's true, as can be seen from \sin(\alpha+\beta)=\sin\alpha\cos\beta+\cos\alpha\sin\beta, because 0&lt;\cos\alpha,\cos\beta&lt;1, but I haven't been able to prove it.

Thanks in advance!

- Kamataat
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kamataat said:
Let \alpha,\beta\in]0;\pi/2[. Prove that \sin(\alpha+\beta)&lt;\sin\alpha+\sin\beta.

My intuition says it's true, as can be seen from \sin(\alpha+\beta)=\sin\alpha\cos\beta+\cos\alpha\sin\beta, because 0&lt;\cos\alpha,\cos\beta&lt;1, but I haven't been able to prove it.

Thanks in advance!

- Kamataat

The inequality should not be a strict one, it should include the "=" sign for the domain given. But otherwise, you're completely on the right track and you've already proven it. You've already made the observation that the cosines are positive for the domain and have magnitude less than or equal to one.

\sin(\alpha + \beta) = \sin\alpha \cos\beta + \cos\alpha \sin\beta \leq \sin\alpha + \cos\alpha \sin\beta \leq \sin\alpha + \sin\beta

and you're done. Note that doing it in two "stages" makes things easier to see. The equality occurs when \alpha = \beta = 0.

EDIT : I should mention that the fact that both sines are also non-negative over the domain is critical in the proof.
 
Last edited:
\sin(\alpha+\beta)=\sin\alpha\cos\beta+\cos\alpha\ sin\beta

Perhaps the identity sin(x) = cos(\frac{\pi}{2} - x) would be helpful. It goes both ways.

\sin(\alpha+\beta)=\sin\alpha\sin(\frac{\pi}{2} - \beta)+\sin(\frac{\pi}{2} - \alpha) sin\beta

Then you get

\sin\alpha\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{2} - \beta\right)+\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{2} - \alpha\right) sin\beta &lt; \sin\alpha + \sin\beta

Unsure thoughts :
For \alpha, \beta &gt; \frac{\pi}{4} [/tex] you are bounded underneath by \sqrt{2} [/tex] on the RHS, but the left will be bounded underneath by 1. Since sine is increasing between \frac{\pi}{4} \rightarrow \frac{\pi}{2} [/tex] it holds for that interval.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Perhaps the easiest way would just be to show that 0 &amp;amp;amp;lt;\sin\alpha+\sin\beta - \sin(\alpha+\beta) by saying that in the given domain the function is bounded below by 0, and is increasing throughout?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top