MHB Prove that every nonzero vector in V is a maximal vector for T.

  • Thread starter Thread starter toni07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
toni07
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Let $T: V \rightarrow V$ be a linear operator on a fi nite-dimensional vector space $V$ over $F$. Assume that $_{\mu T}(x) \in F[x]$ is an irreducible polynomial.

I don't understand how assuming that the minimal polynomial is prime helps to prove the question. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Prove that every nonzero vector in $V$ is a maximal vector for $T$

crypt50 said:
Let $T: V \rightarrow V$ be a linear operator on a fi nite-dimensional vector space $V$ over $F$. Assume that $_{\mu T}(x) \in F[x]$ is an irreducible polynomial.

I don't understand how assuming that the minimal polynomial is prime helps to prove the question. Please help.

Prove which question?

Note that if the field is the field of the real numbers, then the polynomial $x^2+\pi$ is irreducible, which has little to do with primes.
 
Re: Prove that every nonzero vector in $V$ is a maximal vector for $T$

I like Serena said:
Prove which question?

Note that if the field is the field of the real numbers, then the polynomial $x^2+\pi$ is irreducible, which has little to do with primes.

The question in the title: Prove that every nonzero vector in $V$ is a maximal vector for $T$.
 
Re: Prove that every nonzero vector in $V$ is a maximal vector for $T$

crypt50 said:
The question in the title: Prove that every nonzero vector in $V$ is a maximal vector for $T$.

Ah. I missed that.
And I presume that with prime you mean irreducible.

Well. Let's see.
Suppose $V$ is n-dimensional.

Then, if $F$ is algebraically closed (such as the complex numbers), $T$ has n eigenvalues.
If at least 2 eigenvalues are distinct, then the minimal polynomial is reducible.
Therefore all eigenvalues have to be equal.
That means that each nonzero vector has to be a maximal vector for $T$.

If $F$ is the field of the real numbers, we can extend it to the complex numbers, and the same argument holds.

So we're left with all other fields that do not obey the same principles.
Are you supposed to prove it for any field?
 
Re: Prove that every nonzero vector in $V$ is a maximal vector for $T$

crypt50 said:
The question in the title: Prove that every nonzero vector in $V$ is a maximal vector for $T$.

The thread title should give a brief description of the problem, while the problem itself should be fully given within the body of the first post. As you can see, putting the question in the title leads to confusion. :D
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top