Prove that f is uniformly differentiable

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiable
Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement

Suppose f ' is continuous on [a, b] and ε > 0. Prove that there exists ∂ > 0 such that | [f(t)-f(x)]/[t-x] - f '(x) | < ε whenever 0 < |t - x| < ∂, a ≤ x ≤ b, a ≤ t ≤ b.

Homework Equations



Definitions of continuity and differentiability

The Attempt at a Solution

Fix x in [a, b] and ε > 0. Since f ' is continuous at x, there exists a ∂ > 0 such that |f '(x) - f '(t) | < ε whenever 0 < |x - t| < ∂, a ≤ t ≤ b.

Now I'm not sure how this gets me | [f(t)-f(x)]/[t-x] - f '(x) | < ε. I've tried a lot of different things. Can you give me an itsy bitsy hint?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the definition of f'(x)?
 
I like Serena said:
What is the definition of f'(x)?

limt-->x [f(t)-f(x)]/(t-x), provided the limit exists, and I don't know that it does exist in this instance.
 
It is given that f' is continuous on [a,b].
That implies the limit exists.

Now what is the definition of the corresponding limit?
 
I like Serena said:
It is given that f' is continuous on [a,b].
That implies the limit exists.

Now what is the definition of the corresponding limit?

f '(x) = limt-->x [f(t)-f(x)]/[t-x],

so |f '(t) - f '(x)| = | limp-->x [f(p)-f(x)]/[p-x] - limq-->t [f(q)-f(t)]/[q-t] |. In other words, if we choose ε > 0 then for some ∂ > 0 we've simultaneously have

| [f(p)-f(x)]/[p-x] - f '(x) | < ε
and
| [f(q)-f(t)]/[q-t] - f '(t) | < ε

whenever
0 < |p - x|< ∂
and
0 < |q - t| < ∂.
 
I like Serena said:
It is given that f' is continuous on [a,b].
That implies the limit exists.

So you're saying that f ' exists on [a, b], which is what we're trying to prove in the first place ... (?)
 
Jamin2112 said:
So you're saying that f ' exists on [a, b], which is what we're trying to prove in the first place ... (?)

Your problem statement does not ask you to proof that f' exists.
It asks to proof that some expression with epsilon turns out true.

As for the existence of f'.
What is the definition of continuity (for f')?


Jamin2112 said:
f '(x) = limt-->x [f(t)-f(x)]/[t-x],

so |f '(t) - f '(x)| = | limp-->x [f(p)-f(x)]/[p-x] - limq-->t [f(q)-f(t)]/[q-t] |. In other words, if we choose ε > 0 then for some ∂ > 0 we've simultaneously have

| [f(p)-f(x)]/[p-x] - f '(x) | < ε
and
| [f(q)-f(t)]/[q-t] - f '(t) | < ε

whenever
0 < |p - x|< ∂
and
0 < |q - t| < ∂.

That is not the definition of the corresponding limit.

Suppose ##L = \lim\limits_{t \to x} ~ g(t)##.
What is the definition of this limit?
 
I like Serena said:
Your problem statement does not ask you to proof that f' exists.
It asks to proof that some expression with epsilon turns out true.

I actually didn't write down the entire problem. In parentheses it then says "This could be expressed by saying that f is uniformly differentiable on [a, b]." You're telling me that f is uniformly differentiable on [a, b] since f ' is continuous (and thus existant) on [a, b]. Right?



That is not the definition of the corresponding limit.

Suppose ##L = \lim\limits_{t \to x} ~ g(t)##.
What is the definition of this limit?

L is the number for which |L - g(t)| can be made as small we'd like with the appropriate ∂ > 0 and t within the range 0 < |t - x| < ∂.
 
Jamin2112 said:
I actually didn't write down the entire problem. In parentheses it then says "This could be expressed by saying that f is uniformly differentiable on [a, b]." You're telling me that f is uniformly differentiable on [a, b] since f ' is continuous (and thus existant) on [a, b]. Right?

I'm only telling you that f is differentiable on [a,b] since f' is continuous (and thus existant) on [a, b].
"Uniformly" is as yet not in your problem statement.
Jamin2112 said:
L is the number for which |L - g(t)| can be made as small we'd like with the appropriate ∂ > 0 and t within the range 0 < |t - x| < ∂.

Yes. From this definition the epsilon expression in your problem statement follows immediately.
That is, pending on the meaning of the word "whenever" - I'm not sure what that means.
Did you perhaps intend "for every t and x"?

So this does not yet mean "uniformly differentiable".
Do you have a definition handy for that?
 
  • #10
I'm almost there. Here's what I know:

Given x in [a, b] and ε > 0:

f ' is defined on [a, b], so f is continuous on [a, b] (Theorem 5.10), so the Mean Value Theorem can be applied on any subinterval of [a, b]

f ' is continuous on [a, b], so there is a ∂1 > 0 such that | f '(x) - f '(t) | < ∂1 whenever 0 < |t - x| < ∂1.

f '(x), f '(t) of course exist, so there exist ∂2, ∂3 > 0 such that

| [f(s) - f(t)]/[s - t] - f ' (t) | < ε​
and
| [f(y) - f(x)]/[y - x] - f ' x) | < ε​

whenever
0 < |s - t| < ∂2
and
0 < |y - x| < ∂3.​

Somehow I can cut and paste the information (possibly changing ε to ε/2 or something else during the process, possibly invoking the Mean Value Theorem) and obtain

| [f (t) - f(x)] / [t-x] - f '(x) | < ε.​

I'm just not sure how to do it because it's ton of information, some of it possibly unnecessary. But I'm close, aren't I?
 
  • #11
Figured out that problem today (Or did I?). Please critique.
screen-capture-6-4.png


Also, I hope I don't get drunk and forget to turn in my homework, as was often the case last quarter.
 
  • #12
Well, I'm still not seeing the definition of uniform differentiability...

In particular it needs to hold for any t and x in [a,b] with 0<|t-x|<δ, but I'm not seeing anything where you addressed that.
 
  • #13
I like Serena said:
Well, I'm still not seeing the definition of uniform differentiability...

In particular it needs to hold for any t and x in [a,b] with 0<|t-x|<δ, but I'm not seeing anything where you addressed that.

I started with an arbitrary x in [a, b], then picked a t with 0<|t-x|<∂. That, or vice versa (pick t in [a, b] and then an x satisfying 0<|t-x|<∂), should be the correct way.
 
Back
Top