Prove that if A is contained in some closed ball, then A is bounded.

Hodgey8806
Messages
140
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Let M be a metric space and A\subseteqM be any subset:
Prove that if A is contained in some closed ball, then A is bounded.


Homework Equations


Def of closed-ball: \bar{B}R(x) = {y\inM:d(x,y)≤R} for some R>0
Def of bounded: A is bounded if \existsR>0 s.t. d(x,y)≤R \forallx,y\inA
Empty set is defined to be bounded in for these problems

The Attempt at a Solution


Spse that A is contained in some closed ball.
Let that ball be \bar{B}R(y0) = {y\inM:d(y,y0)≤R}, for some arbitrary fixed y0
1) If A=\phi, vacuously true.
2)Let A\subseteq\bar{B}R(y0)
Let x1,x2\inA.
The d(x1,x2)≤d(x1,y0) + d(x2,y0)≤2R.
Thus, diam(A)≤2R and we see that A is bounded.
Q.E.D.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So this is homework but you don't know any relevant formulas or facts? And you haven't made any attempt to do the problem yourself? Are you sure you are taking this class!?

What is the definition of "bounded set"? What is the definition of "closed ball"? If you know those, then this should be relatively easy. If you don't, nothing I say will help you until you have looked up those definitions (different texts may have slightly different definitions- you need to know definitions you are to use.
 
Sorry, I accidentally pressed "Enter" after the title lol. Please, see my attempt. I'm pretty sure it is correct; but, I want to make sure that I don't have to say anymore or elaborate on the empty set bit.

Thank you!
 
Hodgey8806 said:
Spse that A is contained in some closed ball.
Let that ball be \bar{B}R(y0) = {y\inM:d(y,y0)≤R}, for some arbitrary fixed y0
1) If A=\phi, vacuously true.
2)Let A\subseteq\bar{B}R(y0)
Let x1,x2\inA.
The d(x1,x2)≤d(x1,y0) + d(x2,y0)≤2R.
Thus, diam(A)≤2R and we see that A is bounded.
Q.E.D.

Yes, your proof is correct. I don't think you need to elaborate on the empty set case.
 
Thank you very much! I appreciate your help!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top