Prove that (K)^(-1) = (C degree)^(-1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Edwardo_Elric
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the inverse of Kelvin (K) equals the inverse of Celsius degrees (C°). It highlights the relationship between the two temperature scales, noting that Celsius can be converted to Kelvin. The attempt at a solution emphasizes that both temperature scales follow the same formula for calculating temperature change. However, the assertion that K^(-1) equals C°^(-1) is debated, as the relationship between the two scales is not simply reciprocal. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the need for clarity in the mathematical representation of temperature changes.
Edwardo_Elric
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The lesson is about thermal expansion:
Prove:
K^{-1} = (C^{\circ})^{-1}



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know how to do this problem... but Celsius degree results from a change in temperature which can be converted to kelvin...
so C^(degrees) = K
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are talking just about the two temperature scales (Kelvin and Celsius), then there is a simple relation between them, and what you have shown is not it.
 
given 10 degrees as the final temp. and 5 degrees as the initial temp.
both C degrees and K have the formula Tf - Ti;
1/(K) = 1/(C degrees)
1/(tf - ti) = 1/(tf - ti)
1/5 = 1/5
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top