Prove that T(G) is subgroup of G

  • Thread starter Thread starter ilyas.h
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subgroup
ilyas.h
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


lin2.png


Homework Equations


subgroup axioms:

1. a, b in T(G), then ab in T(G)
2. existence of identity element.
3. a in T(G), then a^-1 in T(G)

The Attempt at a Solution



1.

let a be in T(G), then a^n = e.
let b be in T(G), then b^n = e

(ab)^n = (a^n)(b^n) = (e)(e) = e

axiom 1 holds.

2.

let e be in T(G), then e^n = e

conclusion: identity element, e, of G, must be 1.

3.

let a be in T(G), then a^n = e.

show that (a^-1)^n = e

(a^-1)^n = (a^n)^-1 = 1 / a^n = 1 / e

therefore

(a^-1)^n = 1 / e

we know from axiom 2 that e = 1, so:

1 / e = e.

Done.

Is my proof correct? there's not markscheme, can't check answer,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is an error in showing that T is closed under the operation. If x is in T then there exist some number, n, such that x^n= e. If y is in T then there exist some integer m such that y^m= e. You CANNOT assume that m and n are the same. So look at (xy)^{mn}= (x^n)^m(x^m)^n.

To show that there is an identity element you start by saying "Let e be in T(G) then e^n= e and then say "conclusion: identity element of G, e, is 1". That is meaningless!
First, there is no "1" mentioned in the problem. Further, you simply assert that e is in T(G), not that it is an identity element. Nothing you say there has any connection to there being an identity element in T(G).

Instead start by saying "Let e be the identity of G (NOT T(G)). Then, because e^n= e (for all n, not just one), e is in T(G). And since T(G) is a subgroup of G it is also true that ex= xe= x for any x in G. Therefore e, the identity for G, is also the identity for T(G).

Whether you can simply assert that (a^-1)^n= (a^n)^-1 depends upon previous theorems you have proved. Of course, it is true that, since G is abelian, (a^n)(a^-1)^n= e (do you see why "abelian is important?) so that (a^-1)^n= (a^n)^-1.
 
HallsofIvy said:
There is an error in showing that T is closed under the operation. If x is in T then there exist some number, n, such that x^n= e. If y is in T then there exist some integer m such that y^m= e. You CANNOT assume that m and n are the same. So look at (xy)^{mn}= (x^n)^m(x^m)^n.

To show that there is an identity element you start by saying "Let e be in T(G) then e^n= e and then say "conclusion: identity element of G, e, is 1". That is meaningless!
First, there is no "1" mentioned in the problem. Further, you simply assert that e is in T(G), not that it is an identity element. Nothing you say there has any connection to there being an identity element in T(G).

Instead start by saying "Let e be the identity of G (NOT T(G)). Then, because e^n= e (for all n, not just one), e is in T(G). And since T(G) is a subgroup of G it is also true that ex= xe= x for any x in G. Therefore e, the identity for G, is also the identity for T(G).

Whether you can simply assert that (a^-1)^n= (a^n)^-1 depends upon previous theorems you have proved. Of course, it is true that, since G is abelian, (a^n)(a^-1)^n= e (do you see why "abelian is important?) so that (a^-1)^n= (a^n)^-1.
1.

a in T, there exists n such that a^n = e
b in T, there exists m such that b^m = e

(ab)^mn = (a^n)^m (b^m)^n = e^m e^n = e

axiom 1 holds.

2.

let e be identiy in G
e^n = e ==> e in T(G)

T(G) subgroup of G, it's also true that ea = ae =a for all a in G

conclusion: idenity of G, e, is also identity for T(G).

Axiom 2 holds.

3.

this is where I am confused:

Prove that : a in T(G) ====> a^-1 in T(G)

proof:

(a^-1)^n = e
(a^n) (a^-1)^n = (a^n) e
(a)^n (a^-1)^n = (a^n)
(a a^-1)^n = a^n
e^n = a^n

and a^n = e, so:

e^n = e

LHS = RHS

axiom 3 holds.

Am i going along the right lines?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top