MHB Prove the binomial identity ∑(-1)^j(n choose j)=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binomial Identity
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Prove the binomial identity:

$$\sum_{j=0}^{n}(-1)^j{n \choose j}=0$$

- in two different ways
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lfdahl said:
Prove the binomial identity:

$$\sum_{j=0}^{n}(-1)^j{n \choose j}=0$$

- in two different ways
The only way I can think of is to do an induction proof. I haven't sat down to do it but it shouldn't be too hard.

-Dan

(Ahem!) I thought you were asking for help. When I saw it was a challenge I couldn't edit it out. (I thought it was a rather easy problem for you to be asking for help on.) Anyway, if someone else doesn't post it I'll get back to it later.
 
First method.

When $n$ is odd, it’s easy. The coefficients $\displaystyle\binom nj$ and $\displaystyle\binom n{n-j}$ from $j=0$ to $j=n$ pair up nicely; also $(-1)^{n-j}=(-1)^n(-1)^j=-(-1)^j$ (as $n$ is odd). Thus
$$\sum_{j=0}^n(-1)^j\binom nj$$

$\displaystyle=\ \sum_{j=0}^{\frac{n-1}2}\left[(-1)^j\binom nj + (-1)^{n-j}\binom n{n-j}\right]$

$\displaystyle=\ \sum_{j=0}^{\frac{n-1}2}\left[(-1)^j\binom nj - (-1)^j\binom n{n-j}\right]$

$=\ 0$.

Suppose $n$ is even, so $(-1)^n=1$ and $(-1)^{n-1}=-1$. We use the well-known identity
$$\binom nj\ =\ \binom{n-1}{j-1}+\binom{n-1}j$$
(which is simply saying that a binomial coefficient is the sum of the two coefficients above it in Pascal’s triangle). Then
$$\sum_{j=0}^n(-1)^j\binom nj$$

$\displaystyle=\ 1\,+\,\sum_{j=1}^{n-1}\left[(-1)^j\binom{n-1}{j-1} + (-1)^j\binom {n-1}j\right]\,+\,(-1)^n$

$\displaystyle=\ 1\,+\,\sum_{j=1}^{n-1}\left[-(-1)^{j-1}\binom{n-1}{j-1} + (-1)^j\binom {n-1}j\right]\,+\,1$

$\displaystyle=\ 1\,+\,\left[-(-1)^0\binom{n-1}0+(-1)^{n-1}\binom{n-1}{n-1}\right]\,+\,1$ (by telescoping)

$=\ 1+[(-1)+(-1)]+1$

$=\ 0$.Second method.

Expand $0=[1+(-1)]^n$ binomially.
 
Thankyou very much, Olinguito, for your participation and two nice approaches! (Yes)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top