MHB Prove the binomial identity ∑(-1)^j(n choose j)=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binomial Identity
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving the binomial identity ∑(-1)^j(n choose j)=0 using two different methods. One participant suggests using mathematical induction as a potential proof strategy. Another participant expresses surprise at the challenge level, indicating that they initially thought it was an easier problem. They also appreciate the contributions of another member who provided two approaches to the proof. The conversation highlights the collaborative nature of problem-solving in mathematics.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Prove the binomial identity:

$$\sum_{j=0}^{n}(-1)^j{n \choose j}=0$$

- in two different ways
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lfdahl said:
Prove the binomial identity:

$$\sum_{j=0}^{n}(-1)^j{n \choose j}=0$$

- in two different ways
The only way I can think of is to do an induction proof. I haven't sat down to do it but it shouldn't be too hard.

-Dan

(Ahem!) I thought you were asking for help. When I saw it was a challenge I couldn't edit it out. (I thought it was a rather easy problem for you to be asking for help on.) Anyway, if someone else doesn't post it I'll get back to it later.
 
First method.

When $n$ is odd, it’s easy. The coefficients $\displaystyle\binom nj$ and $\displaystyle\binom n{n-j}$ from $j=0$ to $j=n$ pair up nicely; also $(-1)^{n-j}=(-1)^n(-1)^j=-(-1)^j$ (as $n$ is odd). Thus
$$\sum_{j=0}^n(-1)^j\binom nj$$

$\displaystyle=\ \sum_{j=0}^{\frac{n-1}2}\left[(-1)^j\binom nj + (-1)^{n-j}\binom n{n-j}\right]$

$\displaystyle=\ \sum_{j=0}^{\frac{n-1}2}\left[(-1)^j\binom nj - (-1)^j\binom n{n-j}\right]$

$=\ 0$.

Suppose $n$ is even, so $(-1)^n=1$ and $(-1)^{n-1}=-1$. We use the well-known identity
$$\binom nj\ =\ \binom{n-1}{j-1}+\binom{n-1}j$$
(which is simply saying that a binomial coefficient is the sum of the two coefficients above it in Pascal’s triangle). Then
$$\sum_{j=0}^n(-1)^j\binom nj$$

$\displaystyle=\ 1\,+\,\sum_{j=1}^{n-1}\left[(-1)^j\binom{n-1}{j-1} + (-1)^j\binom {n-1}j\right]\,+\,(-1)^n$

$\displaystyle=\ 1\,+\,\sum_{j=1}^{n-1}\left[-(-1)^{j-1}\binom{n-1}{j-1} + (-1)^j\binom {n-1}j\right]\,+\,1$

$\displaystyle=\ 1\,+\,\left[-(-1)^0\binom{n-1}0+(-1)^{n-1}\binom{n-1}{n-1}\right]\,+\,1$ (by telescoping)

$=\ 1+[(-1)+(-1)]+1$

$=\ 0$.Second method.

Expand $0=[1+(-1)]^n$ binomially.
 
Thankyou very much, Olinguito, for your participation and two nice approaches! (Yes)
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K