Prove Uniqueness Theorem: |\phi(t) - \psi(t)| ≤ ∫0t

  • Thread starter Thread starter thedude36
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Uniqueness
thedude36
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I am having to justify the steps in a proof of the uniqueness theorem. I am supposed to show why the inequality follows from the initial equation.

http://i.imgur.com/AxApogj.png

\phi(t) - \psi(t) =∫0t 2s[\phi(t) - \psi(t)] ds


|\phi(t) - \psi(t)| =|∫0t 2s[\phi(t) - \psi(t)] ds| \leq ∫0t 2s|[\phi(t) - \psi(t)]| ds , with t>0

I have no idea where to start. Mostly, I am unsure as to why pulling the 2s out will make it larger than the initial absolute value. Could anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the interval, s is always positive, but the other term may vary in sign. That would lead to some cancellation during the integration process. If we take the absolute value of the integrand, it can only increase the result:
|∫0t 2s[ϕ(t) - ψ(t)] ds| ≤ ∫0t |2s[ϕ(t) - ψ(t)]| ds = ∫0t 2s|[ϕ(t) - ψ(t)]| ds
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top