Proving (a+b)^n = ∑(n_μ)(a^μ)(b^(n-μ)) | a=1, b=-1 using Sequences Test

  • Thread starter Thread starter AnthonyAcc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequences Test
AnthonyAcc
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Show that (^{n}_{n}) - (^{n}_{n-1}) + (^{n}_{n-2}) - (^{n}_{n-3}) + ...(^{n}_{0}) = 0

(a+b)^{n} = \sum^{\infty}_{\nu=0} (^{n}_{\nu})a^{\nu}b^{n-\nu}a=1
b=-1

0 = (1+(-1))^{n} = \sum^{\infty}_{\nu=0}(^{n}_{\nu}) 1^{\nu}(-1)^{n-\nu} = \sum^{\infty}_{\nu=0}(^{n}_{\nu})(-1)^{n-\nu} =

...I don't know what to do here...

= \sum^{n}_{\nu=0}(^{n}_{n-\nu})(-1)^{\nu} = (^{n}_{n}) - (^{n}_{n-1}) + (^{n}_{n-2}) - (^{n}_{n-3}) + ...(^{n}_{0})That is if that last equality is correct and makes sense to be there.

Any suggestions?

Also, how can I make it so everything that follows the Sigma doesn't look like it is being superscripted?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
a=1, b=-1
(1+(-1))n=0

Now try a=-1, b=1 so that

(-1+1)n=0

Or separate the odds from the even and create two separate sums:
sum (even) - sum (odd) = 0
 
Does this \sum^{\infty}_{\nu=0} (^{n}_{\nu}) imply \sum^{n}_{\nu=0} (^{n}_{\nu}) because it's for every n choose \nu so there can only be n many \nus?
 
I told you to use something like this:
\sum_{v=0}^{n/2}\binom{n}{n-2v}(-1)^{2v}*1^{n-2v}+\sum_{v=0}^{n/2}\binom{n}{n-2v-1}(-1)^{2v-1}*1^{n-2v-1}

For the both sums a=-1 and b=1, so that 0-0=0

Use \binom{ } { } for binomial coefficients.

Regards.
 
Last edited:
A more fundamental question I have, I guess, is if I know that \sum^{\infty}_{\nu=0} (^{n}_{\nu}) a^{\nu} b^{n-\nu} = (a+b)^{n} then do I know that
\sum^{n}_{\nu=0} (^{n}_{n-\nu}) a^{\nu} b^{n-\nu} = (a+b)^{n}? How does the changing of infinity to n and the \nu to n - \nu impact the series?
 
Last edited:
n is an integer, right? Then the generalized binomial coefficient C(n,nu) of n and nu is zero for nu>n, also right? There's a zero factor in the definition. That's how you truncate the infinite sum. Though I'm not sure why you have an infinite sum to begin with. And in that case, sure, C(n,nu)=C(n,n-nu).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top