Proving a Limit Using Delta-Epsilon Definition

  • Thread starter Thread starter bluevires
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Limit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around proving the limit of arctan(x) as x approaches infinity, which equals π/2, using the delta-epsilon definition. Participants emphasize the importance of rigor in mathematics, suggesting that intuition alone is insufficient without formal proof. One user recommends solving the inequality |arctan(x) - π/2| < ε to determine an appropriate value for N. The conversation highlights the balance between using intuitive methods and adhering to formal mathematical principles. Ultimately, the focus is on reinforcing the understanding of calculus through rigorous proof techniques.
bluevires
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hey guys

I'm having trouble proving this limit using delta-epsilon definition
I would appreciate some help if possible

<br /> \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \arctan(x)=\frac{\pi}{2}<br />

I know that in order for the statement to be true,
Assuming
Epislon>0
Then |f(x)-L|<Epsilon for x> N

but i havn't had much experience working with trignometric functions, so I don't know how should I set my N equals to, and how could I convert that to |f(x)-L|< Epsilon
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have to use a delta-epsilon definition to solve your problem? Just thinking about the graph of arctan(x) the answer is obvious what happens as x approaches infinity. It seems like a stupid question if you can just come up with the answer in a couple second.
 
Mindscrape said:
It seems like a stupid question if you can just come up with the answer in a couple second.
The point of a calculus class is to learn calculus. If you can't use calculus to compute something "obvious", then how are you going to use calculus to compute something that isn't "obvious"? :-p


bluevires -- why not simply solve the inequality

| \arctan x - \pi / 2 | &lt; \epsilon

for x, to figure out what you should use for N?
 
Yeah, but the point of any math class should be to allow for any viable method to be used, and for math to be open.
 
Mindscrape said:
Yeah, but the point of any math class should be to allow for any viable method to be used, and for math to be open.
No, the point of a math class is to learn math.

Learning to use alternate methods is certainly a part of math, and is a good thing, but using alternate methods at the expense of learning the subject you're supposed to be learning is bad.

(I often advise doing the same problem multiple ways, if you can!)

And, a big part of mathematics is being able to back up your intuition with rigor when appropriate -- it was intuition that told you what the value of the limit should be, but what if someone didn't have as much faith in your intuition? (e.g. a co-worker... a teacher... your boss...)
 
thank you hurkyl, problem solved.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...

Similar threads

Back
Top