Proving a[n]≤2^n using Mathematical Induction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the inequality a[n] ≤ 2^n for a sequence defined recursively as a[k] = a[k-1] + a[k-2] + a[k-3] for k ≥ 3, with initial conditions a[0] = 1, a[1] = 2, a[2] = 3, and a[3] = 6. Participants are engaged in exploring the use of mathematical induction to establish this inequality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the structure of the induction proof, including the base case and the inductive step. There is a focus on how to express a[k+1] in terms of previous terms and how to relate these to powers of 2. Questions arise about the validity of certain steps and the implications of the assumptions made during the proof.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and suggestions for refining the inductive argument. Some participants have pointed out potential missteps in reasoning, while others have affirmed that the current approach is on the right track. There is no explicit consensus yet, but the dialogue is constructive.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of the problem, particularly the need to adhere to the rules of mathematical induction and the definitions of the sequence. There are indications of confusion regarding the manipulation of inequalities and the application of the induction hypothesis.

rtw528
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
1. Define a sequence of numbers in the following way:
a[k]=a[k-1]+a[k-2]+a[k-3] for k≥3, s.t. a[0]=1, a[1]=2, a[2]=3, a[3]=6...
*The numbers in brackets will be subscripts for the whole problem

Prove that a[n]≤2^n using complete mathematical induction.

This is what I have so far.
We'll use complete mathematical induction, where P(n)=a[n]≤2^n
P(0) is the statement a[0]≤2^0.
This is true because 1≤1.
Assume For all n, 0, 1, ..., k a[n]≤2^n is true.
We want to show that for k+t that a[k+1]≤2^(k+1)
Thus, a[k+1]=a[k]+a[k-1]+a[k-2]
And 2^(k+1)=2(2^k)
Therefore, a[k]+a[k-1]+a[k-2]≤2(2^k).

I can't seem to get past this part. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rtw528 said:
1. Define a sequence of numbers in the following way:
a[k]=a[k-1]+a[k-2]+a[k-3] for k≥3, s.t. a[0]=1, a[1]=2, a[2]=3, a[3]=6...
*The numbers in brackets will be subscripts for the whole problem

Prove that a[n]≤2^n using complete mathematical induction.

This is what I have so far.
We'll use complete mathematical induction, where P(n)=a[n]≤2^n
P(0) is the statement a[0]≤2^0.
This is true because 1≤1.
Assume For all n, 0, 1, ..., k a[n]≤2^n is true.
We want to show that for k+t that a[k+1]≤2^(k+1)
Thus, a[k+1]=a[k]+a[k-1]+a[k-2]
"Thus" isn't the right word here since it doesn't follow from your assumption and what you want to show. a[k+1]=a[k]+a[k-1]+a[k-2] by definition of the sequence.
rtw528 said:
And 2^(k+1)=2(2^k)
Therefore, a[k]+a[k-1]+a[k-2]≤2(2^k).

I can't seem to get past this part. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Start with a[k+1] = a[k]+a[k-1]+a[k-2].
On the right side, a[k] <= 2k, a[k-1] <= 2k - 1, and a[k-2] <= 2k - 2, right? So what can you say about a[k]+a[k-1]+a[k-2]?
 
Mark44 said:
So what can you say about a[k]+a[k-1]+a[k-2]?

that a[k]+a[k-1]+a[k-2]≤2^k+2^(k-1)+2^(k-2). but how would I get to 2^(k+1) from here?
 
Factor the expression on the right - what do you get?
 
1.75*(2^k)
 
What do you get in terms of 2k-2?
 
2k-2(22+2+1), which is 2k-2(7). since neither this nor the other can get me to what I want, I made a mistake somewhere
 
Last edited:
No, this is the right track. Note that 7 < 23.
 
And since 7<23, they are not equal but since the first two are, you use ≤ instead of = or <. Also 2k-223≥7(2k-2)
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Basically you are showing that an+1 = an + an - 1 + an - 2 ≤ 2n-2(7) < 2n-2(8) = 2n+1

IOW, that an+1 ≤ 2n+1.
 
  • #11
Thanks so much for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K