Proving a Proposition in Metric Spaces: Finding the Intersection of Two Balls

fluxions
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to prove this proposition:

Let a and b be points in a metric space and r, s > 0. If c belongs to the intersection of B(a; r) and B(s; b), then there exists a number t > 0 such that B(c; t) is contained in the intersection of B(a; r) and B(s; b).

(where B(a; r) = {x in M : d(x,a) < r} if (M,d) is the metric space.)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Let d be the metric.

Well I know what I want to prove, namely for some for t > 0, d(x,c) < t implies d(x,a) < r and d(x,b) < s.

About all I have to work withis the hypothesis that c is in the intersection of the two balls (so d(c,a) < r and d(c,b) < s) and the the triangle inequality. All I can come up is something like d(x,c) <= d(x,a) + d(a,c) < d(x,a) + r (and a similar string of inequalities for d(x,b)), which clearly doesn't do much.

I can't figure out the right t. Help please!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use your intuition to decide what t should be. Draw an open disc of radius r centered at a. Draw an open disc of radius s centered at b. Draw c in the intersection. How far is c from the boundary of the first disc? How far is c from the boundary of the second disc? Take t to be the minimum of those two distances.

Then write up a formal proof using your t.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top