Proving Conservation of (u_{α}+eA_{α})ξα on Particle World Line in Relativistic Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the expression (u_{α} + eA_{α})ξ^{α} remains constant along the world line of a charged particle in a relativistic framework. The equations of motion involve the four-velocity u^{α} and the electromagnetic field tensor F_{αβ}, with the presence of a Killing vector ξ^{α} indicating symmetries in spacetime. One participant attempted to show that the expression satisfies the geodesic equation, but found this approach unproductive. Another contributor suggested that a logical argument might be more effective than a calculational proof, referencing the Hamiltonian formalism as a potential avenue for understanding constants of motion. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of integrating gravitational and electromagnetic influences in relativistic mechanics.
mtak0114
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
1. Question

A particle with an electric charge e moves in a spacetime with the metric g_{\alpha\beta} in the presence of a vector potential A_{\alpha}.

The equations of motion are u_{\alpha;\beta}u^{\beta} = eF_{\alpha\beta}u^{\beta}, where u^{\alpha} is the four-velocity and F_{\alpha\beta} = A_{\beta;\alpha}-A_{\alpha;\beta}. It is assumed that the spacetime possesses a killing vector \xi^{\alpha},

so that \mathcal{L}_{\xi}g_{\alpha\beta} = {L}_{\xi}A_{\alpha} = 0.

Prove that (u_{\alpha}+eA_{\alpha})\xi^{\alpha}

is constant on the world line of the particle.

Homework Equations



\mathcal{L}_{\xi}g_{\alpha\beta} = \xi_{\alpha;\beta}+ \xi_{\beta;\alpha}

\mathcal{L}_{\xi}A_{\alpha} = A_{\alpha;\beta}\xi^{\beta}+ \xi^{\beta}_;\alpha}A_{\beta}

The Attempt at a Solution


My approach at this problem was to show that (u_{\alpha}+eA_{\alpha})
satisfies the geodesic equation

and hence the inner product with the killing vector would be constant but doing so did not lead to any useful results.

Any suggestions or comments to this approach would be greatly appreciated

thanks

mtak

Note: this problem was from: A Relativists toolkit: The mathematics of black-hole mechanics
by Eric Poisson
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just a quick question: How did you express the geodesic equation in the presence of the electromagnetic field as well as the gravitational field?
 
Here is an amplification on my quick question in the previous post. The equation of motion for your charged particle is not the geodesic equation of the form of Poisson's equation (1.14). Rather, if you have access to Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler's "Gravitation", look at page 898. In the middle of the page is the equation of motion of your charged particle in the elementary coordinate representation. The lefthand side of that equation is the standard geodesic equation form, but the righthand side is a "source term" --the Lorentz force. But note the sentence after this term: "The Hamiltonian formalism enables one to discover immediately two constants of motion; the elementary Lorentz-force equation does not." I interpret this to mean that perhaps rather than a calculational proof that (u_{\alpha} + eA_{\alpha}) \xi^{\alpha} is a constant on the world line, you need a logical argument.

I hope these comment are of use to you
 
One more though: You could read the whole of section 33.5 in MTW and obtain the results you want using the Hamiltonian formulation, but I'm sure that's NOT what Poisson had in mind when he posed that problem!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Thread 'Stacked blocks & pulley system'
I've posted my attempt at a solution but I haven't gone through the whole process of putting together equations 1 -4 yet as I wanted to clarify if I'm on the right path My doubt lies in the formulation of equation 4 - the force equation for the stacked block. Since we don't know the acceleration of the masses and we don't know if mass M is heavy enough to cause m2 to slide, do we leave F_{12x} undetermined and not equate this to \mu_{s} F_{N} ? Are all the equations considering all...
Back
Top