Proving Continuous Functions Cannot Be Two-to-One

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
jeff1evesque
Messages
312
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose [tex]f: [0,1] \rightarrow R[/tex] is two-to-one. That is, for each [tex]y \in R, f^{-1}({y})[/tex] is empty or contains exactly two points. Prove that no such function can be continuous.


Homework Equations


Definition of a continuous function:
Suppose [tex]E \subset R[/tex] and f: E \rightarrow R[/tex]. If [tex]x_0 \in E[/tex] then f is continuous at [tex]x_0[/tex] iff for each [tex]\epsilon > 0[/tex], there is [tex]\varphi >0[/tex] such that if
[tex]|x - x_0| < \varphi, x \in E[/tex],​
then
[tex]|f(x) - f(x_0)| < \epsilon[/tex].​

If f is continuous at x for every [tex]x \in E[/tex], then we say f is continuous.


The Attempt at a Solution


I think from an algebraic view, there is more elements in the domain then codomain which means that the function f is not one-to-one, but onto. Though I know this fact, I am pretty sure this will not aid in my attempt to prove this problem. Could someone help me understand why f cannot be continuous.


Thanks,


Jeffrey Levesque
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try assuming that f is continuous and then using the extreme and intermediate value theorems to produce a y in R with more than two values in its pre-image.