Proving Convergence of {S_n/n} for Bounded Sequence {S_n}

Shayes
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If {S_n} is a sequence whose values lie inside an interval [a,b], prove {S_n/n} is convergent.

We don't know Cauchy sequence yet. All we know is the definition of a bounded sequence, and convergence and divergence of sequences. Along with comparison tests and Squeeze theorem.

Homework Equations



Limit of a sequence: abs(S_n - L) < Epsilon whenever n>=N, provided for Epsilon>0.

The Attempt at a Solution



I see that every convergent sequence is bounded, but the opposite isn't always true, so how do I show that the smaller sequence is convergent given that {S_n} is bounded?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I think you can use the squeeze theorem, since a/n <= S_n/n <= b/n and they both converge to 0. Do you need to proove that a/n converges or can you use that?
 


susskind_leon said:
I think you can use the squeeze theorem, since a/n <= S_n/n <= b/n and they both converge to 0. Do you need to proove that a/n converges or can you use that?

i thought of that, but is that the same as saying the entire sequence converges?

i feel like this statement says that each term is squeezed between the interval, but it doesn't say anything about if the limit of the sequence's terms is taken to infinity.
 


Yes it does! Check the squeeze theorem carefully!
 


Shayes said:
i thought of that, but is that the same as saying the entire sequence converges?

i feel like this statement says that each term is squeezed between the interval
I have no idea what this means, but the crucial point is the "n" in the denominator. What are the linits of a/n and b/n?

, but it doesn't say anything about if the limit of the sequence's terms is taken to infinity.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top