Proving Epsilon-Limit for a Sequence with Algebraic Manipulation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Unassuming
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Epsilon Proof
Unassuming
Messages
165
Reaction score
0
Suppose $\lim_n \frac{a_n -1}{a_n +1} = 0$. Prove that $\lim_n a_n = 1$.

I am trying to do the algebra so that -a_n < ?? < a_n , but I am having trouble. Am I going about this correctly?

I have also tried to solve each separate side of the inequality. I get a_n < (e+1)/(1-e), but this is not quite fitting.

Can somebody give me a clue please. Thanks

Edit: There is a hint in the book that says to set,

\(x_{n}=\frac{a_n-1}{a_n+1}\) and then solve.

I have done this but I don't know what to do next.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I presume the hint said set x_n= (a_n-1)/(a_n+ 1) and solve for xn. When you did that what did you get? What is the limit of that as x goes to 0?
 
I solved for a_n and I then took the lim of both sides so that

lim a_n = lim ( -x_n -1 ) / (x_n -1 ), then it was pretty straightforward.

Assuming I can take the lim of both sides. Can I do that?
 
Yes, of course. Just use the basic "rules" for limits. If the limits of an and bn exist, and the limit of bn is not 0, then the limit of an/bn exists.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top