Proving equation involving limits without derivatives

  • Thread starter Thread starter V0ODO0CH1LD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivatives Limits
V0ODO0CH1LD
Messages
278
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is not really a homework or a coursework question. But I got a warning that I should submit my post in this section of the website.. I'm just saying this because I don't know if the answer to my question is at all achievable. And if it is how I should go about trying to solve it. Anyway.. Here is my question:

Can I prove that:
\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{(\frac{a^h-1}{h})}{(\frac{b^h-1}{h})} = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{a^h-1}{b^h-1} = log_ba
without using derivatives?

Of course the first equality is trivial But I thought it might be important, that's why it is there.

Homework Equations



Honestly don't know..

Maybe the squeeze theorem?

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried making both sides an exponent of b. Which would looks like:
b^{log_ba} = b^{\frac{a^h-1}{b^h-1}}
which means:
a = b^{\frac{a^h-1}{b^h-1}}
I don't even know if that is the right path though..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
V0ODO0CH1LD said:

Homework Statement



This is not really a homework or a coursework question. But I got a warning that I should submit my post in this section of the website.. I'm just saying this because I don't know if the answer to my question is at all achievable. And if it is how I should go about trying to solve it. Anyway.. Here is my question:

Can I prove that:
\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{(\frac{a^h-1}{h})}{(\frac{b^h-1}{h})} = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{a^h-1}{b^h-1} = log_ba
without using derivatives?

Of course the first equality is trivial But I thought it might be important, that's why it is there.

Homework Equations



Honestly don't know..

Maybe the squeeze theorem?

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried making both sides an exponent of b. Which would looks like:
b^{log_ba} = b^{\frac{a^h-1}{b^h-1}}
which means:
a = b^{\frac{a^h-1}{b^h-1}}
I don't even know if that is the right path though..

You could use the taylor series of a^h=exp(log(a)*h) and similarly for b. But, of course, the taylor series involves derivatives. I'm not really sure you can even define what a^h even means without using derivatives in some way. I'm not sure you should bother trying.
 
Derivatives are inherent to that, though they could be hidden.


$$\lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{a^h-1}{h}=\log(a)$$

can be derived a number of ways and is analogous to

$$\lim_{h \rightarrow 0} (1+a h)^h=e^a$$
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top