Proving f(f-1(B))=B: Understanding Preimages and Set Inclusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter SMA_01
  • Start date Start date
SMA_01
Messages
215
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Define f:S→T, where B\subseteqT. Let f-1(B)={x\inS:f(x)\inB} be the preimage of B.

Demonstrate that for any such map f, f(f-1(B))=B.

My main question is, would I prove this using set inclusion both ways?

I was going to begin by letting an element be in the preimage of B, and explain what that means, then mapping that element to B. Would this be correct?

I just need a push in the right direction.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SMA_01 said:

Homework Statement



Define f:S→T, where B\subseteqT. Let f-1(B)={x\inS:f(x)\inB} be the preimage of B.

Demonstrate that for any such map f, f(f-1(B))=B.

My main question is, would I prove this using set inclusion both ways?

I was going to begin by letting an element be in the preimage of B, and explain what that means, then mapping that element to B. Would this be correct?

I just need a push in the right direction.

Thank you.
Generally, yes. To show set equality you need to show inclusion in both directions.
 
Define f:S→T, where B\subseteqT. Let f-1(B)={x\inS:f(x)\inB} be the preimage of B.

Demonstrate that for any such map f, f(f-1(B))=B.
Just to let you know, but that equality is false in general. You need extra assumptions on f.
 
SammyS- Thank you

Micromass- Yes, the function needs to be surjective, right? I'm not sure why there were no assumptions...
 
micromass said:
Just to let you know, but that equality is false in general. You need extra assumptions on f.
I'm very reluctant to question you, micromass.

But isn't the extra assumption of f needed for f^{-1}\left(f(A)\right)=A rather than for f\left(f^{-1}(B)\right)=B\ ?
 
SammyS said:
I'm very reluctant to question you, micromass.

But isn't the extra assumption of f needed for f^{-1}\left(f(A)\right)=A rather than for f\left(f^{-1}(B)\right)=B\ ?

An extra assumption is needed for both. Consider f(x)=x^2 and B=[-1,0]. Then f^{-1}(B)=\{0\} and thus f(f^{-1}(B))=\{0\}. The problem is that f is not surjective.
 
micromass said:
An extra assumption is needed for both. Consider f(x)=x^2 and B=[-1,0]. Then f^{-1}(B)=\{0\} and thus f(f^{-1}(B))=\{0\}. The problem is that f is not surjective.
Well, my reluctance was well founded!

Thanks as always.
 
Back
Top