Proving f(x) has one real root

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miike012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Root
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the function f(x) has only one real root using Rolle's Theorem. Participants clarified that if the derivative f'(x) is not equal to zero (f'(x) ≠ 0) for all x, it implies that f(x) can only cross the x-axis once, confirming the existence of a single real root. A misunderstanding arose regarding the converse statement, where one participant incorrectly assumed that a scenario with f'(x) = 0 could still yield one real root, which does not align with the theorem's implications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Rolle's Theorem
  • Knowledge of derivatives and their implications
  • Familiarity with the concept of real roots in functions
  • Basic graphing skills to visualize function behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Rolle's Theorem in depth
  • Learn about the Mean Value Theorem and its relationship with derivatives
  • Explore examples of functions with multiple roots versus single roots
  • Review graphical interpretations of functions and their derivatives
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone studying calculus, particularly those interested in understanding the behavior of functions and their derivatives in relation to real roots.

Miike012
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
0
The problem asked to prove by contradiction that the function has only one real root. They used Roll'es theorem and proved that f ' (x) =/= 0 then they concluded that because f ' (x) =/= 0 then by contradiction the function can have atleast one real root...


Look at the picture it has the answer to the solution...

Question:
I don't understand the logic... I made up a graph where f ' (x) = 0 but yet f(x) still only has one real root... so how is disproving that f'(x) can never equal zero prove that f(x) has atleast only one real root when I obviously showed a scenario in which f'= 0 but f only has one root
 

Attachments

  • math.jpg
    math.jpg
    23.5 KB · Views: 633
Physics news on Phys.org
The proof is saying because f'(x)>0 for all x, there is only one real root. You're confusing that statement with its converse, "f(x) has only one real root; therefore, f'(x)>0," which isn't generally true.
 
thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K