Proving Group Equality for Normal Subgroups

  • Thread starter Thread starter DanielThrice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Normal
DanielThrice
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
No. This isn't homework. And I think I am right there with this one.

I'm interested in the intersection of groups and what they equal, my professor proposed starting with something like this:

Show that if H and K are normal subgroups of a group G such that H∩K = {e}, then hk = kh for all h ∈ H and for all k ∈ K.

I've gotten this far:

kh-1k-1 = h(kh-1k-1) = (hkh-1)k-1 ∈ H∩K

Am I allowed to assume what I just did?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first equality is wrong.
Essentially what you want to show is that hkh-1k-1=e.
But H∩K={e}, so just show that hkh-1k-1∈ H and hkh-1k-1∈ K.
 
hkh-1k-1 = h(kh-1k-1; and H is normal, which tells you that kh-1k-1is in H. So hkh-1k-1 is the product of two elements of H and is therefore in H.
Is this correct? What about for K?
 
Similair idea:

hkh-1k-1=(hkh-1)k-1
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top