Proving Integral of an Irrational Function

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 5K views
PFStudent
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
Hey,

Homework Statement


(From an Integration Table)
Prove,
[tex] {\int}{\sqrt {{{a}^{2}} - {{x}^{2}}}}{dx} = {{\frac {1}{2}}{\left(}{{{x}{\sqrt {{{a}^{2}} - {{x}^{2}}}}} + {{{a}^{2}}{\arcsin{\frac {x}{a}}}}}{\right)}}{,}{\,}{\,}{\,}{\,}{\,}{\,}{{{|}{x}{|}}{\leq}{{|}{a}{|}}}[/tex]

Homework Equations


Knowledge of Trigonometric Substitution for Integration ("Backwards" and "Forwards").

Knowledge of integration techniques involving the form,
[tex] {\sqrt {{{a}^{2}} - {{x}^{2}}}}[/tex]

Integration by Parts (IBP),
[tex] {\int}{d{\left[}{u(x)}{v(x)}{\right]}} = {\int}{\biggl[}{u(x)}{d[v(x)]} + {v(x)}{d[u(x)]}{\biggl]}[/tex]

[tex] {\int}{u(x)}{d[v(x)]} = {{u(x)}{v(x)}} - {\int}{v(x)}{d[u(x)]}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


What is bothering me about this integral is that I do not have a [itex]{x}[/itex] term on the outside of the radical which is preventing from evaluating this integral by normal convention.

Let,
[tex] {I} = {\int}{\sqrt {{{a}^{2}} - {{x}^{2}}}}{dx}[/tex]

In applying trigonometric substitution - consider the right triangle,
327047_Trigonometry.JPG


So,
[tex] {{a}{\sin{\theta}}} = {\sqrt {{{a}^{2}} - {{x}^{2}}}}[/tex]

Solving by "forward" substitution,
[tex] {x} = {\pm}{\sqrt {{{a}^{2}}{{\cos}^{2}{\theta}}}}[/tex]

However, how would you justify which root to take: the positive one or the negative one?

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would justify it by arguing that x is the length of a side of a triangle, which is a non-negative quantity.
 
I'm pretty sure all you have to do is...

x = a sin(t)
dx = a cos(t) dt

I = a S sqrt(1 - sin^2 t) * a cos(t) dt = a^2 S cos^2 t dt

Now just use a double-angle identity to evaluate the integral and then perform the appropriate substitutions to get back to the solution to the original problem. Not too bad...
 
Yeah, that's what I was originally thinking too, HallsOfIvy. But does that count as proof? I guess it should. huh.
 
Hey,

e(ho0n3 said:
I would justify it by arguing that x is the length of a side of a triangle, which is a non-negative quantity.

Ok, that makes sense - I kind of thought that reasoning as well. Thanks.

Thanks,

-PFStudent